[PULL 67/83] hw/arm/aspeed: avoid sign mismatch on sscanf for uart property

Cédric Le Goater <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.nongnu.qemu-arm,org.nongnu.qemu-devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
From: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <[email protected]>

using "%u" with sscanf() was likely meant to indicate that a
negative value was unexpected, but with a signed variable it
could result in undefined behaviour.

use "%d" and check for a negative input explicitly.

Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <[email protected]>
---
 hw/arm/aspeed.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/arm/aspeed.c b/hw/arm/aspeed.c
index a48c44205837..a9238e6217dd 100644
--- a/hw/arm/aspeed.c
+++ b/hw/arm/aspeed.c
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static void aspeed_set_bmc_console(Object *obj, const char *value, Error **errp)
     int uart_first = aspeed_uart_first(sc->uarts_base);
     int uart_last = aspeed_uart_last(sc->uarts_base, sc->uarts_num);
 
-    if (sscanf(value, "uart%u", &val) != 1) {
+    if (sscanf(value, "uart%d", &val) != 1 || val < 0) {
         error_setg(errp, "Bad value for \"uart\" property");
         return;
     }
-- 
2.55.0
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.