RE: [PATCH 00/10] QEMU: CXL Type-2 device passthrough via vfio-pci
Manish Honap <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.nongnu.qemu-arm,org.nongnu.qemu-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <IA1PR12MB9030BE8DCE38D3477F565EF3BDA42@IA1PR12MB9030.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Junjie Cao <[email protected]> > Sent: 18 August 2026 15:22 > To: Manish Honap <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Ankit Agrawal <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; Srirangan Madhavan > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > Krishnakant Jaju <[email protected]>; Vikram Sethi <[email protected]>; Zhi > Wang <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] QEMU: CXL Type-2 device passthrough via vfio- > pci > > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > Hi Manish, > > On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 18:36:13 +0530, Manish Honap wrote: > > Base: master (post pull-9p-20260725), commit 6333226c2a. > > The footer's base-commit is 055952c0aa (the pull-hex-20260812v2-1 > merge) and that is where the series applies; this line looks stale. > > On that base, cxl-test still passes 12/12 and bios-tables-test fails two > cases from the new pxb-cxl _DSM -- details on patch 10. Comments on 6 and > 7 as well. > > Many thanks, > Junjie Hello Junjie, Thank you for your review. I looked at the branch commit state and you are correct - the base commit at the footer is stale. I will rebase onto current master and regenerate the patch series with suggested fixes.