Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/14] hw/arm: add TI AM64x SoC and am64-virt machine
Wadim Mueller <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.nongnu.qemu-arm,org.nongnu.qemu-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-08-22 13:22, Bin Meng wrote: > Hi Wadim, > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 8:48 PM Wadim Mueller <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Add support for the TI AM64x (Sitara AM6442) SoC and a board around it, >> ``am64-virt``. The model is complete enough to run the stock TI boot chain >> end to end: > > Should the machine be named as something that matches an existing > board from TI, instead of `am64-virt`, which makes me think it's just > something we created just for emulation purpose? > Yeah, the name is misleading, and it also undersells what is there. The SoC side is not really virt-like: it is the real AM64x memory map, GICv3 at the silicon addresses, the real UART / I2C / timer / secure-proxy offsets, and it boots stock unmodified vendor firmware through the complete chain ROM -> R5 SPL -> TF-A/OP-TEE -> U-Boot -> Linux. What I did not mention in the cover letter is that my development tree already models the board identity as well: an M24C32 at i3c address 0x50, preloaded with a valid PHYTEC api-v2 identity blob with the correct size and CRC so that mainline u-boot's accepts it. This is what the vendor U-Boot reads to detect the SoM. I left it out of v2 because I was not sure if board specific identity data is wanted upstream, but I think now this was the wrong decision, because it is exactly the proof that this is a board model and not something synthetic. So IMHO the options are: a) am64-phycore, which matches the phyCORE-AM64x SoM that I boot and test every day, and the identity EEPROM moves from the SoC model into the board file, where it belongs anyway b) am64-evm or am64-sk, after TMDS64GPEVM or SK-AM64B, which means doing the board identity again against TI's EEPROM format and getting that firmware I would prefer a), because this is the configuration I have hardware for and which I can keep testing for regressions, so the maintenance story is realistic. One caveat: not every peripheral is modelled. CPSW is only an unimplemented-device stub and there is no ethernet node in the DT. For booting this does not matter, because the whole chain runs from SD/eMMC, but a machine with a board name should probably document what is there and what is not. docs/system/arm/am64.rst does this already, and in v3 I will make the name and the documented scope match. So my question back: does a non-TI board around the SoC (a SoM from PHYTEC) fulfill your "matches an existing board", or would you rather see a TI branded one? Best regards, Wadim >> >> ROM boot (tiboot3.bin) -> R5 SPL -> TF-A/OP-TEE -> U-Boot -> Linux SMP >> >> This is a resend: I posted a first RFC back in May [1] but got no feedback >> on it. Since then was the series rebased onto actual master, reworked for >> style and split into reviewable pieces, so I send it out again in the hope >> of getting some review. >> >> RFC because I would like feedback on the overall approach before polishing >> further; see the open questions at the end. >> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/[email protected]/ >> >> What is modelled >> ================ >> >> The SoC is heterogeneous, and the model reflects that: a Cortex-A53 >> cluster behind a GICv3 (GIC-500) at the real addresses, the Cortex-R5F >> MCU boot core, and the Cortex-M4F, each with their own RAT (region >> address translation) view of the memory map. >> >> The interesting part is the DMSC. On real silicon it is a hidden core >> running TI's system firmware (SYSFW) which answers TI-SCI requests for >> clocks, power, firewalls and processor boot control from every other core. >> Rather than trying to execute the vendor blob, patch 10 models the DMSC >> as a TI-SCI endpoint sitting on top of the secure proxy model (patch 9). >> That is what actually starts the A53 and M4F cores when the R5 SPL asks >> for it, and what TF-A, OP-TEE, U-Boot and Linux talk to for clock/power >> management. >> >> The remaining devices (patches 4-8) are the supporting cast: the UART, >> the K3 DMTimer, mailboxes, and register-level stubs for CTRL_MMR >> (including the DEVSTAT boot pins), GTC, DDRSS, the SDHCI PHY wrapper and >> the TRNG. The >> stubs implement the handshakes, which firmware polls for, not the >> underlying hardware. >> >> Patches 1-3 are prerequisites that touch existing code: >> >> 1-2 give the OMAP I2C model its own Kconfig symbol so it can be reused >> outside the OMAP1 SoC, and implement soft reset and NACK reporting >> 3 fixes SDHCI ADMA chain processing; without it, transfer rate >> depends from the virtual clock instead of on the guest's >> programming. Patch 14 contains a qtest that fails without it. >> >> To patch 3: it is only needed as long as Bin Meng's SDHCI series [2] (on >> top of the SDMA boundary fix [3]) is not merged. I posted the same fix >> standalone in August, Bin showed then, that his series already covers >> the AM64x case, and I have withdrawn it there [4]. It is kept here only >> so that this series works on actual master - please drop patch 3 >> together with the pacing qtest in patch 14 as soon as [2] lands. A >> version of that qtest for the Icicle Kit was posted separately [5]. >> >> [2] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?series=515264 >> [3] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?series=513930 >> [4] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/[email protected]/ >> [5] https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/[email protected]/ >> >> Testing >> ======= >> >> Patch 14 adds: >> >> * a unit test for the combined-boot-image parser >> * qtests for the machine topology, GICv3 layout, SMP handling and the >> DMSC TI-SCI request/response path >> * an I2C qtest (soft reset, NACK, and a read from an at24c EEPROM which >> the test attaches with -device) >> * the SDHCI ADMA pacing reproducer >> * a functional test that builds a synthetic tiboot3.bin containing a >> bare-metal R5 payload and checks it runs from the certified entry >> point. Setting QEMU_TEST_TIBOOT3 boots a real image instead. >> >> Migration is not supported yet: none of the new devices has a VMState. >> I left it out for the RFC, but can add it if you want it before merge. >> >> The series was built and tested on top of ae4f344320. Every patch builds >> on its own, and checkpatch reports no errors. >> >> Open questions >> ============== >> >> * pc-bios/dtb/am64-virt.dtb: patch 13 checks in a generated DTB (with >> its source) for convenience. I am not sure a machine-specific blob >> belongs in pc-bios; happy to drop it and have the functional test >> generate it with dtc instead, or drop the Linux-boot part of the test. >> >> * Splitting the DMSC: hw/misc/ti-dmsc.c is large because TI-SCI is >> large. It could be split per message class (clocks / devices / >> processor boot / security) if reviewers prefer, at the cost of a >> non-functional intermediate state. >> >> * Only one of the four R5F cores is modelled. mc->max_cpus reserves >> room for the rest. Because the SoC realizes M4F/R5F vCPUs in addition >> to the A53s and every vCPU needs a TCG context slot inside >> smp.max_cpus, the machine defaults to the full vCPU budget. I would >> appreciate a better idea than the actual "fail early with an >> explanatory message" handling when the user passes a too-small -smp. >> >> * The register-level stubs (DDRSS in particular) fake success rather >> than modelling the hardware. That is deliberate, but tell me if you >> would rather see them as plain unimplemented-device windows plus >> firmware quirks elsewhere. >> >> Wadim Mueller (14): >> hw/i2c/omap_i2c: add a dedicated CONFIG_OMAP_I2C symbol >> hw/i2c/omap_i2c: implement soft reset and NACK reporting >> hw/sd/sdhci: complete non-interrupt ADMA descriptor chains in one pass >> hw/char: add TI AM64x UART model >> hw/timer: add TI K3 DMTimer model >> hw/misc: add TI K3 CTRL_MMR, GTC, DDRSS, SDHCI PHY and TRNG models >> hw/misc: add TI RAT (region address translation) model >> hw/misc: add TI mailbox (IPC) model >> hw/misc: add TI K3 secure proxy model >> hw/misc: add TI DMSC (TI-SCI system controller) model >> hw/arm: add TI K3 combined boot image parser >> hw/arm: add TI AM64x SoC model >> hw/arm: add the am64-virt machine >> tests: add AM64x unit, qtest and functional tests >> >> MAINTAINERS | 22 + >> docs/system/arm/am64.rst | 74 + >> docs/system/target-arm.rst | 1 + >> hw/arm/Kconfig | 26 + >> hw/arm/am64-virt.c | 347 ++++ >> hw/arm/k3-bootrom-parse.c | 250 +++ >> hw/arm/k3-bootrom.c | 125 ++ >> hw/arm/meson.build | 4 + >> hw/arm/ti-am64x.c | 1223 ++++++++++++ >> hw/arm/trace-events | 4 + >> hw/char/Kconfig | 4 + >> hw/char/meson.build | 1 + >> hw/char/ti-am64-uart.c | 109 ++ >> hw/i2c/Kconfig | 4 + >> hw/i2c/meson.build | 2 +- >> hw/i2c/omap_i2c.c | 234 ++- >> hw/misc/Kconfig | 27 + >> hw/misc/meson.build | 10 + >> hw/misc/ti-dmsc.c | 1725 +++++++++++++++++ >> hw/misc/ti-k3-ctrlmmr.c | 103 + >> hw/misc/ti-k3-ddrss.c | 98 + >> hw/misc/ti-k3-gtc.c | 100 + >> hw/misc/ti-k3-sdhci-phy.c | 91 + >> hw/misc/ti-k3-trng.c | 139 ++ >> hw/misc/ti-mailbox.c | 566 ++++++ >> hw/misc/ti-rat.c | 290 +++ >> hw/misc/ti-sec-proxy.c | 446 +++++ >> hw/misc/trace-events | 62 + >> hw/sd/sdhci-internal.h | 9 + >> hw/sd/sdhci.c | 23 +- >> hw/timer/Kconfig | 3 + >> hw/timer/meson.build | 1 + >> hw/timer/ti-k3-dmtimer.c | 177 ++ >> include/hw/arm/k3-bootrom.h | 43 + >> include/hw/arm/ti-am64x.h | 86 + >> include/hw/char/ti-am64-uart.h | 28 + >> include/hw/misc/ti-dmsc.h | 661 +++++++ >> include/hw/misc/ti-k3-ctrlmmr.h | 26 + >> include/hw/misc/ti-k3-ddrss.h | 26 + >> include/hw/misc/ti-k3-gtc.h | 23 + >> include/hw/misc/ti-k3-sdhci-phy.h | 26 + >> include/hw/misc/ti-k3-trng.h | 35 + >> include/hw/misc/ti-mailbox.h | 44 + >> include/hw/misc/ti-rat.h | 51 + >> include/hw/misc/ti-sec-proxy.h | 108 ++ >> include/hw/timer/ti-k3-dmtimer.h | 30 + >> pc-bios/dtb/am64-virt.dtb | Bin 0 -> 6116 bytes >> pc-bios/dtb/am64-virt.dts | 292 +++ >> tests/functional/aarch64/meson.build | 2 + >> tests/functional/aarch64/test_am64_bootrom.py | 137 ++ >> tests/qtest/am64-adma-pacing-test.c | 243 +++ >> tests/qtest/am64-virt-test.c | 502 +++++ >> tests/qtest/meson.build | 1 + >> tests/qtest/ti-am64-i2c-test.c | 137 ++ >> tests/unit/meson.build | 1 + >> tests/unit/test-k3-bootrom.c | 263 +++ >> 56 files changed, 9060 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 docs/system/arm/am64.rst >> create mode 100644 hw/arm/am64-virt.c >> create mode 100644 hw/arm/k3-bootrom-parse.c >> create mode 100644 hw/arm/k3-bootrom.c >> create mode 100644 hw/arm/ti-am64x.c >> create mode 100644 hw/char/ti-am64-uart.c >> create mode 100644 hw/misc/ti-dmsc.c >> create mode 100644 hw/misc/ti-k3-ctrlmmr.c >> create mode 100644 hw/misc/ti-k3-ddrss.c >> create mode 100644 hw/misc/ti-k3-gtc.c >> create mode 100644 hw/misc/ti-k3-sdhci-phy.c >> create mode 100644 hw/misc/ti-k3-trng.c >> create mode 100644 hw/misc/ti-mailbox.c >> create mode 100644 hw/misc/ti-rat.c >> create mode 100644 hw/misc/ti-sec-proxy.c >> create mode 100644 hw/timer/ti-k3-dmtimer.c >> create mode 100644 include/hw/arm/k3-bootrom.h >> create mode 100644 include/hw/arm/ti-am64x.h >> create mode 100644 include/hw/char/ti-am64-uart.h >> create mode 100644 include/hw/misc/ti-dmsc.h >> create mode 100644 include/hw/misc/ti-k3-ctrlmmr.h >> create mode 100644 include/hw/misc/ti-k3-ddrss.h >> create mode 100644 include/hw/misc/ti-k3-gtc.h >> create mode 100644 include/hw/misc/ti-k3-sdhci-phy.h >> create mode 100644 include/hw/misc/ti-k3-trng.h >> create mode 100644 include/hw/misc/ti-mailbox.h >> create mode 100644 include/hw/misc/ti-rat.h >> create mode 100644 include/hw/misc/ti-sec-proxy.h >> create mode 100644 include/hw/timer/ti-k3-dmtimer.h >> create mode 100644 pc-bios/dtb/am64-virt.dtb >> create mode 100644 pc-bios/dtb/am64-virt.dts >> create mode 100644 tests/functional/aarch64/test_am64_bootrom.py >> create mode 100644 tests/qtest/am64-adma-pacing-test.c >> create mode 100644 tests/qtest/am64-virt-test.c >> create mode 100644 tests/qtest/ti-am64-i2c-test.c >> create mode 100644 tests/unit/test-k3-bootrom.c >> >> >> base-commit: ae4f3443209ab154b48b706a146e5f557ab147cb > > Regards, > Bin