Re: [PATCH 2/5] target/riscv: Add SiFive custom int8 matmul extension implied rules

Daniel Henrique Barboza <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.nongnu.qemu-devel,org.nongnu.qemu-riscv
Message-ID <[email protected]>

On 7/21/2026 9:20 AM, Max Chou wrote:
> From: Frank Chang <[email protected]>
> 
> Add SiFive custom int8 matmul extension implied rules to enable the
> implied extensions of SiFive custom int8 matmul extension recursively.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frank Chang <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Max Chou <[email protected]>
> ---
>   target/riscv/cpu.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> index e643d7c7af..70baa054f9 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> @@ -2811,6 +2811,24 @@ static RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule ZVFBFA_IMPLIED = {
>       },
>   };
>   
> +static RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule XSFVQMACCDOD_IMPLIED = {
> +    .ext = CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_xsfvqmaccdod),
> +    .implied_multi_exts = {
> +        CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zve32x),
> +
> +        RISCV_IMPLIED_EXTS_RULE_END
> +    },
> +};
> +
> +static RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule XSFVQMACCQOQ_IMPLIED = {
> +    .ext = CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_xsfvqmaccqoq),
> +    .implied_multi_exts = {
> +        CPU_CFG_OFFSET(ext_zve32x),
> +
> +        RISCV_IMPLIED_EXTS_RULE_END
> +    },
> +};
> +
>   RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule *riscv_misa_ext_implied_rules[] = {
>       &RVA_IMPLIED, &RVD_IMPLIED, &RVF_IMPLIED,
>       &RVM_IMPLIED, &RVV_IMPLIED, &RVG_IMPLIED,
> @@ -2832,6 +2850,7 @@ RISCVCPUImpliedExtsRule *riscv_multi_ext_implied_rules[] = {
>       &ZVKS_IMPLIED,  &ZVKSC_IMPLIED, &ZVKSG_IMPLIED, &SHA_IMPLIED,
>       &SSCFG_IMPLIED, &SUPM_IMPLIED, &SSPM_IMPLIED, &SMCTR_IMPLIED,
>       &SSCTR_IMPLIED, &SSSTATEEN_IMPLIED,
> +    &XSFVQMACCDOD_IMPLIED, &XSFVQMACCQOQ_IMPLIED,

Not related to this patch but I wonder if we should put one rule per line
in this array.  Every once in a while we have to add a rule that is
in a line that already has a lot of stuff, then we need to change multiple
lines to accommodate the new rule.


As for the patch:



Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <[email protected]>





>       NULL
>   };
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.