Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] migration/rdma: Introduce RDMA_CONTROL_NUM

Fabiano Rosas <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.nongnu.qemu-devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Peter Xu <[email protected]> writes:

> Introduce this to say how many control messages we have.  We did it because
> we're going to remove the last one (RDMA_CONTROL_UNREGISTER_FINISHED) soon.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jinpu Wang <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <[email protected]>
> ---
>  migration/rdma.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/rdma.c b/migration/rdma.c
> index 438419d189..62a509b236 100644
> --- a/migration/rdma.c
> +++ b/migration/rdma.c
> @@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ enum {
>      RDMA_CONTROL_REGISTER_FINISHED,   /* current iteration finished */
>      RDMA_CONTROL_UNREGISTER_REQUEST,  /* dynamic UN-registration */
>      RDMA_CONTROL_UNREGISTER_FINISHED, /* unpinning finished */
> +    RDMA_CONTROL_NUM,
>  };
>  
>  
> @@ -235,7 +236,7 @@ static const char *control_desc(unsigned int rdma_control)
>          [RDMA_CONTROL_UNREGISTER_FINISHED] = "UNREGISTER FINISHED",
>      };
>  
> -    if (rdma_control > RDMA_CONTROL_UNREGISTER_FINISHED) {
> +    if (rdma_control >= RDMA_CONTROL_NUM) {
>          return "??BAD CONTROL VALUE??";
>      }

Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <[email protected]>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.