Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] hw/riscv/k230: wire up the RMU device
Daniel Henrique Barboza <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.nongnu.qemu-riscv,org.nongnu.qemu-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, On 7/9/2026 12:12 AM, jack wang wrote: > From: Jack Wang <[email protected]> > > Replace the "rmu" create_unimplemented_device() stub with a real > K230RmuState instance mapped at the K230_DEV_RMU memmap entry, select > K230_RMU from the K230 Kconfig, and document the device. So, as I said in patch 1, applying this patch will fix the qtest that you introduced there. I believe we want to either squash this patch in patch 1 or move the qtest creation to this patch. Both are fine to me. > > Closes: gevico/qemu-camp-2026-k230#11 Not sure what gevico is (seems like a bootcamp, according to Google at least) but the "Closes" tag usually contains a gitlab bug or any other link that is publicly available. It's better to remove it. Thanks, Daniel > Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <[email protected]> > --- > docs/system/riscv/k230.rst | 1 + > hw/riscv/Kconfig | 1 + > hw/riscv/k230.c | 10 +++++++--- > include/hw/riscv/k230.h | 2 ++ > 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/docs/system/riscv/k230.rst b/docs/system/riscv/k230.rst > index cea8202e55..3f2313a127 100644 > --- a/docs/system/riscv/k230.rst > +++ b/docs/system/riscv/k230.rst > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ The ``k230`` machine supports the following devices: > * Core Local Interruptor (CLINT) > * Platform-Level Interrupt Controller (PLIC) > * 2 K230 Watchdog Timer > +* K230 Reset Management Unit (RMU) > * 5 UART > > Boot options > diff --git a/hw/riscv/Kconfig b/hw/riscv/Kconfig > index 54e41a6afc..bffa4e69c8 100644 > --- a/hw/riscv/Kconfig > +++ b/hw/riscv/Kconfig > @@ -149,3 +149,4 @@ config K230 > select SERIAL_MM > select UNIMP > select K230_WDT > + select K230_RMU > diff --git a/hw/riscv/k230.c b/hw/riscv/k230.c > index 502281c52c..b55e90c0d2 100644 > --- a/hw/riscv/k230.c > +++ b/hw/riscv/k230.c > @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ static void k230_soc_init(Object *obj) > object_initialize_child(obj, "c908-cpu", cpu0, TYPE_RISCV_HART_ARRAY); > object_initialize_child(obj, "k230-wdt0", &s->wdt[0], TYPE_K230_WDT); > object_initialize_child(obj, "k230-wdt1", &s->wdt[1], TYPE_K230_WDT); > + object_initialize_child(obj, "k230-rmu", &s->rmu, TYPE_K230_RMU); > > qdev_prop_set_uint32(DEVICE(cpu0), "hartid-base", 0); > qdev_prop_set_string(DEVICE(cpu0), "cpu-type", TYPE_RISCV_CPU_THEAD_C908); > @@ -206,6 +207,12 @@ static void k230_soc_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) > sysbus_connect_irq(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(&s->wdt[1]), 0, > qdev_get_gpio_in(DEVICE(s->c908_plic), K230_WDT1_IRQ)); > > + /* RMU (reset management unit) */ > + if (!sysbus_realize(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(&s->rmu), errp)) { > + return; > + } > + sysbus_mmio_map(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(&s->rmu), 0, memmap[K230_DEV_RMU].base); > + > /* unimplemented devices */ > create_unimplemented_device("kpu.l2-cache", > memmap[K230_DEV_KPU_L2_CACHE].base, > @@ -268,9 +275,6 @@ static void k230_soc_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) > create_unimplemented_device("cmu", memmap[K230_DEV_CMU].base, > memmap[K230_DEV_CMU].size); > > - create_unimplemented_device("rmu", memmap[K230_DEV_RMU].base, > - memmap[K230_DEV_RMU].size); > - > create_unimplemented_device("boot", memmap[K230_DEV_BOOT].base, > memmap[K230_DEV_BOOT].size); > > diff --git a/include/hw/riscv/k230.h b/include/hw/riscv/k230.h > index 592e1c26bf..13f2a1ab0b 100644 > --- a/include/hw/riscv/k230.h > +++ b/include/hw/riscv/k230.h > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ > #include "hw/core/boards.h" > #include "hw/riscv/riscv_hart.h" > #include "hw/watchdog/k230_wdt.h" > +#include "hw/misc/k230_rmu.h" > > #define C908_CPU_HARTID (0) > > @@ -33,6 +34,7 @@ typedef struct K230SoCState { > RISCVHartArrayState c908_cpu; /* Small core */ > > K230WdtState wdt[2]; > + K230RmuState rmu; > MemoryRegion sram; > MemoryRegion bootrom; >