Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 3/3] tests/qtest: add K230 UART test

Hi Daniel,

Thanks for the review!


On 8/6/26 04:10, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>
> Any reason to use g_usleep() instead of qtest_clock_step()?  There are 
> a couple
> of g_usleep() uses in the code but you used lots of qtest_clock_step() 
> too.
>
> AFAIK g_usleep() is wall time and qtest_clock_step() is simulated 
> time, and
> I guess you should be using qtest_clock_step() for all the pollings 
> you're
> doing in this file.
>

You're right, there's no reason to mix them here. I'll fix this in v3.


Regards,

WX Chen