Re: [PATCH 00/19] rust: QObject and QAPI bindings

On 12/10/25 15:50, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Let us know what you'd prefer and we'll switch.  Alternatively,
>> retconning -B's meaning so that it applies to Rust will work too. :)
> 
> Any particular reason *not* to generate Rust unconditionally along with
> C?

Two reasons I can think of:

1) the exact layout is still in flux (not modular, no commands or events).

2) Rust prefers to have all files under a common path ("mod xyz" directs 
the compiler to look at xyz.rs or xyz/mod.rs), which doesn't work well 
if they are created in qapi/meson.build.  There's plenty of workarounds, 
but I'd rather not pick one until the layout is fixed.

So maybe for now we can use -B and not pollute qapi/meson.build, and 
when the generator is more complete we can move Rust generation there?

Paolo