Re: [PATCH v5 02/24] include: define constant for early constructor priority

On 1/9/26 12:46, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> IMHO the root problem is that it is pretty dubious for us to be
> spawning the RCU thread from a constructor. Constructors should
> be limited to minimal initialization of state. Spawning threads
> is outside the boundary of what I'd consider reasonable for
> a constructor todo. I didn't want try to tackle refactoring the
> RCU thread creation though, hence this gross workaround.

I see.  Maybe we could (just as gross but smaller) do the RCU 
constructor late.  Not something that you need to do now, of course.

Paolo