Re: [PATCH v6 25/27] util: add support for formatting a program name in messages
Markus Armbruster <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Feb 2026 08:11:57 +0100
| Newsgroups | org.nongnu.qemu-rust,org.nongnu.qemu-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Daniel P. Berrangé <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 11:08:45AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Daniel P. Berrangé <[email protected]> writes: >> >> > The error_report function can include the program name in any >> > messages it prints. The qemu_log function has no equivalent >> > behaviour. >> > >> > This introduces support for a "program name" in the new >> > messages API, which will be included by default for all >> > binaries. >> > >> > This change tweaks the output of the error_report function, >> > adding a space between the program name and the location >> > info. >> >> Why? > > Looking again, arguably that is fixing a pre-existing bug > > The current code is: > > if (!monitor_cur() && g_get_prgname()) { > error_printf("%s:", g_get_prgname()); > sep = " "; > } > switch (cur_loc->kind) { > case LOC_CMDLINE: > argp = cur_loc->ptr; > for (i = 0; i < cur_loc->num; i++) { > error_printf("%s%s", sep, argp[i]); > sep = " "; > } > error_printf(": "); > break; > case LOC_FILE: > error_printf("%s:", (const char *)cur_loc->ptr); > if (cur_loc->num) { > error_printf("%d:", cur_loc->num); > } > error_printf(" "); > break; > default: > error_printf("%s", sep); > } > > > Notice how we honour "sep" for LOC_CMDLINE but ignore > it for LOC_FILE. This works exactly as intended. To illustrate, add error_report("test, ignore"); to qdev_device_add(), then: $ cat t.cfg [device] driver = "usb-kbd" $ qemu-system-x86_64 -S -display none -machine usb=on -device usb-kbd -readconfig t.cfg -monitor stdio QEMU 10.2.50 monitor - type 'help' for more information qemu-system-x86_64: -device usb-kbd: test, ignore qemu-system-x86_64:t.cfg:2: test, ignore (qemu) device_add usb-kbd test, ignore The format program:sourcefile:lineno: message conforms to the GNU Coding Standards at <https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#Errors>, and matches common practice. > With the program name printing moved out into a separate > function, the space is always printed. No change for > LOC_CMDLINE, but new whitespace for LOC_FILE. > > Should have changed this in a separate patch. > >> > The qemu_log function will gain the program name. This >> > can be easily seen with the 'log' trace backend, and how it >> > is now more closely matching error_report output. >> > >> > Before: >> > >> > # qemu-system-x86_64 -object tls-creds-x509,id=t0,dir=fish -d 'trace:qcrypto*' >> > qcrypto_tls_creds_x509_load TLS creds x509 load creds=0x5584e13937f0 dir=fish >> > qcrypto_tls_creds_get_path TLS creds path creds=0x5584e13937f0 filename=ca-cert.pem path=<none> >> > qemu-system-x86_64: Unable to access credentials fish/ca-cert.pem: No such file or directory >> > >> > After: >> > >> > # qemu-system-x86_64 -object tls-creds-x509,id=t0,dir=fish -d 'trace:qcrypto*' >> > qemu-system-x86_64: qcrypto_tls_creds_x509_load TLS creds x509 load creds=0x5584e13937f0 dir=fish >> > qemu-system-x86_64: qcrypto_tls_creds_get_path TLS creds path creds=0x5584e13937f0 filename=ca-cert.pem path=<none> >> > qemu-system-x86_64: Unable to access credentials fish/ca-cert.pem: No such file or directory >> > >> > When adding this the '-msg program-name=on|off' option is >> > introduced, so that the program name (which is enabled by >> > default) can be supressed if desired. This could be useful >> > if '-msg guest-name=on' is being used as a more informative >> > identifier. >> >> Separate patch? > > It is a bit of a borderline decision, but I felt the knob to turn it > off should be in the same patch that force enables it. Peter objected to making the logs more verbose by default, and I think he has a point. Perhaps having errors and logs share a general format is useful anyway, and perhaps making it even more configurable is as well. I figure we'd need separate configuration for logs and for error messages. Let's get to rough consensus before we debate the finer points like this one. >> > Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <[email protected]> >> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <[email protected]> > > With regards, > Daniel