Re: [PATCH v2] hw/display/vmware_vga: Don't allow guest to trigger long running loop in host
Daniel P. Berrangé <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Jul 2026 16:16:26 +0100
| Newsgroups | org.nongnu.qemu-trivial,org.nongnu.qemu-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Jul 23, 2026 at 03:54:41PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 23/7/26 14:44, Thomas Huth wrote: > > From: Thomas Huth <[email protected]> > > > > The code in the SVGA_CMD_DEFINE_ALPHA_CURSOR handler in vmsvga_fifo_run() > > basically does: > > > > x = vmsvga_fifo_read(s); > > y = vmsvga_fifo_read(s); > > args = x * y; > > goto badcmd; > > ... > > badcmd: > > len -= args; > > if (len < 0) { > > goto rewind; > > } > > while (args--) { > > vmsvga_fifo_read(s); > > } > > > > Thus by supplying huge values for x and y that overflow the result of > > the multiplication, the guest can trigger a long-running loop here > > that burns the host's CPU cycles. > > > > Add some sanity checks so that this cannot happen anymore. > > > > Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/work_items/3782 > > Reported-by: Feifan Qian <[email protected]> > > Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/work_items/4026 > > Reported-by: Tristan Madani <[email protected]> > > Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/work_items/4076 > > Reported-by: Sunday Jiang > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <[email protected]> > > --- > > v2: Use SVGA_MAX_WIDTH and SVGA_MAX_HEIGHT instead of an arbitrary value > > > > hw/display/vmware_vga.c | 6 +++++- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/hw/display/vmware_vga.c b/hw/display/vmware_vga.c > > index f6f9edfd1d9..567806f0e47 100644 > > --- a/hw/display/vmware_vga.c > > +++ b/hw/display/vmware_vga.c > > @@ -737,6 +737,10 @@ static void vmsvga_fifo_run(struct vmsvga_state_s *s) > > vmsvga_fifo_read(s); > > x = vmsvga_fifo_read(s); > > y = vmsvga_fifo_read(s); > > + if (x < 0 || x >= SVGA_MAX_WIDTH || > > + y < 0 || y >= SVGA_MAX_HEIGHT) { > > vmsvga_fifo_read() returns unsigned... otherwise: But x & y are declared 'int', so at least on 32-bit builds a large uint32_t value would wrap and become negative. Although we dropped support for 32-bit platforms, IMHO it would be better to use uint32_t for 'x' and 'y' too rather than assuming the 'int' value won't be negative. > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]> > > > + goto rewind; > > + } > > args = x * y; > > goto badcmd; > > case SVGA_CMD_RECT_ROP_FILL: > > @@ -776,7 +780,7 @@ static void vmsvga_fifo_run(struct vmsvga_state_s *s) > > if (len < 0) { > > goto rewind; > > } > > - while (args--) { > > + while (args-- > 0) { > > vmsvga_fifo_read(s); > > } > > printf("%s: Unknown command 0x%02x in SVGA command FIFO\n", > > With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com ~~ https://hachyderm.io/@berrange :| |: https://libvirt.org ~~ https://entangle-photo.org :| |: https://pixelfed.art/berrange ~~ https://fstop138.berrange.com :|