Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] pull request for net-next: batman-adv 2026-07-28

--nextPart3093944.VdNmn5OnKV
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; protected-headers="v1"
From: Sven Eckelmann <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2026 08:55:51 +0200
Message-ID: <3386526.aV6nBDHxoP@sven-l14>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0

On Tuesday, 4 August 2026 04:19:20 CEST Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2026 15:39:03 +0200 Simon Wunderlich wrote:
> > here is a minor bugfix/cleanup pull request of batman-adv to go into net-next.
> 
> Can you look thru the Sashiko comments here (especially Medium+
> severity)?
> 
> https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/[email protected]

https://patchwork.open-mesh.org/bundle/ecsv/pu-main/

We were just waiting for a verdict. I am guessing it it a "no, will not 
merge", correct?

> At a glance patch 14 does not inspire confidence. I guess patch 15
> removes the worst part - but is there a real reason not to use locking?

In its current state, you would need spinlocks over larger (op-count) portions 
of code in the hot-path. And since it it nearly impossible to get feedback 
from the TT author/maintainer, I am not willing to invest time in a total 
rewrite of the TT infrastructure.

Regards,
	Sven


--nextPart3093944.VdNmn5OnKV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYKAB0WIQS81G/PswftH/OW8cVND3cr0xT1ywUCanGM9wAKCRBND3cr0xT1
y3sqAP93VUsjB/3zBZEPOEwVl9F8KchEpqol2vmkE2mbdlui4gD/ZcZ0qOW3IWsP
+5olqy4xUDXtdwWKz+2KDX80Fe+2mwI=
=12G3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart3093944.VdNmn5OnKV--