Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net] igb: Reject hwtstamp requests when PTP is unavailable

On Sat, Aug 15, 2026 at 01:08:15AM +0000, Shivani Gupta wrote:

...

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_ptp.c

...

> @@ -1378,6 +1384,25 @@ void igb_ptp_init(struct igb_adapter *adapter)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* Initialize all state used by the PHC and timestamping paths before
> +	 * registering either interface. INIT_WORK() only initializes the work
> +	 * item; no work is queued until timestamping is enabled.
> +	 */
> +	spin_lock_init(&adapter->tmreg_lock);
> +	INIT_WORK(&adapter->ptp_tx_work, igb_ptp_tx_work);
> +
> +	if (adapter->ptp_flags & IGB_PTP_OVERFLOW_CHECK)
> +		INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&adapter->ptp_overflow_work,
> +				  igb_ptp_overflow_check);
> +
> +	adapter->tstamp_config.rx_filter = HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NONE;
> +	adapter->tstamp_config.tx_type = HWTSTAMP_TX_OFF;
> +
> +	/* Initialize the hardware clock before ptp_clock_register() makes its
> +	 * callbacks visible. The overflow work is started after registration.
> +	 */
> +	igb_ptp_reset(adapter);
> +
>  	adapter->ptp_clock = ptp_clock_register(&adapter->ptp_caps,
>  						&adapter->pdev->dev);
>  	if (IS_ERR(adapter->ptp_clock)) {

Hi Shivani,

There is an AI-generated review of this patch available at
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260815010815.91898-1-shivani07g%40gmail.com

Of that review the following item stands out to me.
I would appreciate it if you could look over it in particular.

  Does this code leave the hardware interrupt unmasked if ptp_clock_register()
  fails?

  The call to igb_ptp_reset() unconditionally unmasks the Time Sync hardware
  interrupt. If ptp_clock_register() fails, adapter->ptp_clock is set to NULL,
  but the hardware state is not reverted.

  If a hardware interrupt occurs, igb_tsync_interrupt() is called:

  igb_tsync_interrupt()
      if (adapter->ptp_caps.pps)
          ptp_clock_event(adapter->ptp_clock, &event);

  Will this result in a NULL pointer dereference when adapter->ptp_clock is
  passed to ptp_clock_event()?

...