Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] serial: 8250_aspeed_vuart: add VUART over PCI
Jiri Slaby <[email protected]> Thu, 9 Jul 2026 07:18:59 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.ozlabs.lists.linux-aspeed,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-serial |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 08. 07. 26, 18:46, Andrew Lunn wrote: >> + if (silicon_revision_id == AST2600A3_REVISION_ID) >> + rc = regmap_update_bits(scu, ASPEED_SCUC24, >> + ASPEED_SCUC24_PCIDEV1_INTX_MSI_HOST2BMC_EN | ASPEED_SCUC24_MSI_ROUTING_MASK, >> + ASPEED_SCUC24_PCIDEV1_INTX_MSI_HOST2BMC_EN | ASPEED_SCUC24_MSI_ROUTING_PCIE2LPC_PCIDEV1); >> + else >> + rc = regmap_update_bits(scu, ASPEED_SCUC24, >> + /** >> + * The bit 14 is reserved in the Datasheet. >> + */ >> + ASPEED_SCUC24_PCIDEV1_INTX_MSI_SCU560_EN | BIT(14) | ASPEED_SCUC24_MSI_ROUTING_MASK, >> + ASPEED_SCUC24_PCIDEV1_INTX_MSI_SCU560_EN | BIT(14) | ASPEED_SCUC24_MSI_ROUTING_PCIE2LPC_PCIDEV1); > > checkpatch should be warning about these long lines. Traditionally, > the limit is 80 character lines, but recently 100 has been accepted by > some subsystems. The exception is when wrapping the lines will make > them less readable, but i don't think that applies here. FWIW 100 is fine by me. 80 is too ancient limit. -- js suse labs