Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] fsck.erofs: implement concurrent directory traversal

On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 09:02:38PM +0530, Nithurshen Karthikeyan wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 8:58 PM Gao Xiang <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > As I told you the merging policy, each patch should have no
> > regression, if concurrent directory traversal is useful, please
> > just implement it as a base, I won't accept PATCH 1/2 since
> > it has regression and useless.
> >
> As I told in the email, I am just stating that this patch is a definite
> improvement and meets the merging policy, and I will implement
> parallelised decompression on top of this patch only in a few days.
> 
> I hope you could review this patch and let me know your thoughts.

So why it's called `[PATCH v2 2/2]` rather than [PATCH v6] fsck.erofs:
implement concurrent directory traversal?

>