Re: [PATCH] erofs: reuse superblock for file-backed mounts
Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Jul 2026 15:49:14 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.ozlabs.lists.linux-erofs,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Pedro Falcato <[email protected]> writes: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 02:41:20PM +0200, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: >> When the same file is mounted multiple times (via path or fd), reuse >> the existing superblock instead of creating a new one. This allows >> multiple mounts of the same image to share in-kernel data structures >> more efficiently. >> >> The backing file is identified by its inode and fsoffset. If mount >> options conflict, a separate superblock is created transparently as >> a fallback. >> >> Tested by mounting a 177M Fedora EROFS image 20 times with full >> traversal: >> >> ``` >> \#!/bin/sh >> IMG=${1:-/root/fedora.erofs} >> N=20 >> DIR=$(mktemp -d) >> trap "umount $DIR/m* 2>/dev/null; rm -rf $DIR" EXIT >> >> sync; echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches >> INODES_BEFORE=$(grep erofs_inode /proc/slabinfo | awk '{print $2}') >> MEM_BEFORE=$(grep ^Slab: /proc/meminfo | awk '{print $2}') >> >> for i in $(seq 1 $N); do mkdir $DIR/m$i && mount -t erofs "$IMG" >> $DIR/m$i && find $DIR/m$i > /dev/null; done >> >> echo "Superblocks: $(grep $DIR /proc/self/mountinfo | awk '{print $3}' | sort -u | wc -l)" >> echo "erofs_inode delta: +$(( $(grep erofs_inode /proc/slabinfo | awk '{print $2}') - INODES_BEFORE ))" >> echo "Slab delta: +$(( $(grep ^Slab: /proc/meminfo | awk '{print $2}') - MEM_BEFORE )) kB" >> ``` >> >> unpatched kernel: >> >> Superblocks: 20 >> erofs_inode delta: +46368 >> Slab delta: +39952 kB >> 0.08user 0.82system 0:00.98elapsed 93%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 4796maxresident)k >> 19168inputs+10304outputs (24major+16672minor)pagefaults 0swaps >> >> patched kernel: >> >> Superblocks: 1 >> erofs_inode delta: +2044 >> Slab delta: +1088 kB >> 0.07user 0.21system 0:00.31elapsed 91%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 4848maxresident)k >> 19024inputs+6784outputs (25major+16810minor)pagefaults 0swaps >> >> The time difference shows that sharing the superblock also benefits >> the page cache and inode cache, as subsequent mounts of the same image >> avoid re-reading the backing file. This is particularly useful for >> container hosts running multiple containers from the same base image. > > Doesn't this approach break-down as soon as you get to change SB flags (through > e.g mount -o remount)? It will change superblock flags for all of them, right? > > (I don't think you can switch off the superblock transparently on a > reconfigure?) This is the same preexisting behavior for block device mounts. That said, I realize this can feel confusing since EROFS is not a block device and allowed this so far. One way to solve this could be an explicit mount option "share_sb" that is opt-in and, once set, blocks any remount operations. Would that work? Regards, Giuseppe