Re: [PATCH] erofs: support SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA in inode_share mode
Gao Xiang <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.ozlabs.lists.linux-erofs,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Jingbo, On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 07:37:13PM +0800, Jingbo Xu wrote: > When inode_share is enabled, erofs_ishare_fops.llseek falls back to > generic_file_llseek, which treats the whole file as data and always > returns i_size for SEEK_HOLE, hiding real holes in sparse files. > > Switch it to erofs_file_llseek instead. For user files f_mapping->host > is always the real erofs inode, so SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA resolve the > per-file on-disk layout via iomap_seek_hole()/iomap_seek_data(). > > Reported-by: Yuanhe Shu <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Jingbo Xu <[email protected]> > --- > fs/erofs/data.c | 2 +- > fs/erofs/internal.h | 2 ++ > fs/erofs/ishare.c | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/erofs/data.c b/fs/erofs/data.c > index d2f01245ee79..09d668deb86d 100644 > --- a/fs/erofs/data.c > +++ b/fs/erofs/data.c > @@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static int erofs_file_mmap_prepare(struct vm_area_desc *desc) > #define erofs_file_mmap_prepare generic_file_readonly_mmap_prepare > #endif > > -static loff_t erofs_file_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence) > +loff_t erofs_file_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence) > { > struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host; > const struct iomap_ops *ops = &erofs_iomap_ops; > diff --git a/fs/erofs/internal.h b/fs/erofs/internal.h > index 57bd21859c65..3263c11d714c 100644 > --- a/fs/erofs/internal.h > +++ b/fs/erofs/internal.h > @@ -528,6 +528,8 @@ static inline struct inode *erofs_real_inode(struct inode *inode, bool *need_ipu > } > #endif > > +loff_t erofs_file_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence); > + Could you move this line below erofs_fiemap()? I hope all declarations in data.c are closer. Otherwise it looks good to me, Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <[email protected]> Also could you help write a test for this functionality too? Thanks, Gao Xiang