Re: [PATCH] erofs: support SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA in inode_share mode

On 8/20/26 9:33 PM, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Hi Jingbo,
> 
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 07:37:13PM +0800, Jingbo Xu wrote:
>> When inode_share is enabled, erofs_ishare_fops.llseek falls back to
>> generic_file_llseek, which treats the whole file as data and always
>> returns i_size for SEEK_HOLE, hiding real holes in sparse files.
>>
>> Switch it to erofs_file_llseek instead.  For user files f_mapping->host
>> is always the real erofs inode, so SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA resolve the
>> per-file on-disk layout via iomap_seek_hole()/iomap_seek_data().
>>
>> Reported-by: Yuanhe Shu <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Jingbo Xu <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  fs/erofs/data.c     | 2 +-
>>  fs/erofs/internal.h | 2 ++
>>  fs/erofs/ishare.c   | 2 +-
>>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/erofs/data.c b/fs/erofs/data.c
>> index d2f01245ee79..09d668deb86d 100644
>> --- a/fs/erofs/data.c
>> +++ b/fs/erofs/data.c
>> @@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ static int erofs_file_mmap_prepare(struct vm_area_desc *desc)
>>  #define erofs_file_mmap_prepare	generic_file_readonly_mmap_prepare
>>  #endif
>>  
>> -static loff_t erofs_file_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
>> +loff_t erofs_file_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence)
>>  {
>>  	struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
>>  	const struct iomap_ops *ops = &erofs_iomap_ops;
>> diff --git a/fs/erofs/internal.h b/fs/erofs/internal.h
>> index 57bd21859c65..3263c11d714c 100644
>> --- a/fs/erofs/internal.h
>> +++ b/fs/erofs/internal.h
>> @@ -528,6 +528,8 @@ static inline struct inode *erofs_real_inode(struct inode *inode, bool *need_ipu
>>  }
>>  #endif
>>  
>> +loff_t erofs_file_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int whence);
>> +
> 
> Could you move this line below erofs_fiemap()? I hope all declarations
> in data.c are closer.

Sure.

> 
> Otherwise it looks good to me,
> Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <[email protected]>
> 
> Also could you help write a test for this functionality too?

Will post the test later after posting v2.

-- 
Thanks,
Jingbo