Re: [PATCH] erofs: Fix EROFS_FS_ZIP_LZMA_DEFAULT_MAX_STREAMS default logic
Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.ozlabs.lists.linux-erofs,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 09:10:25PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 05:51:08AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 12:00:23PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > When NR_CPUS is less than 16, or when SMP is disabled, the default value > > > of 16 is invalid. > > > > > > While actual configuration picks up a sensible and valid default > > > (NR_CPUS or 1), "make savedefconfig" will still write a line like > > > > > > CONFIG_EROFS_FS_ZIP_LZMA_DEFAULT_MAX_STREAMS=1 > > > > > > to the defconfig file, even if that matches the sensible default. > > > > > > Avoid needlessly enlarging the defconfig files, and reduce churn for > > > updating them, by specifying valid defaults depending on SMP and > > > NR_CPUS. > > > > > > While at it, make the prompt depend on SMP, as there is no point in > > > asking the user about the maximum number of decompression streams if > > > there is only one valid answer. > > > > > > > Absolutely agree. > > As I replied to Geert, unless there is a mandatory requirement > documented that "there is no point to make a Kconfig visible if there > is only one valid number". > I would call that common sense. Guenter > I tend to avoid making EROFS Kconfig visibility depend on arbitrary > architecture Kconfig options such as SMP or !SMP; SMP here is due to > some arches make NR_CPUS = 0 if !SMP, but it doesn't need to bother > users why a EROFS kconfig visibility has some relationship with an arch > kconfig. > > Thanks, > Gao Xiang