Re: [PATCH v4 phy-next 0/9] RCW override for 10G Lynx dynamic protocol reconfiguration

Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.infradead.lists.linux-phy,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <20260723150105.da2cqgtb7t5vw2d3@skbuf>
On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 02:15:54AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Ioana Ciornei (4):
>   soc: fsl: guts: use a macro to encode the DCFG CCSR space
>   soc: fsl: guts: add a global structure to hold state
>   soc: fsl: guts: add a central fsl_guts_read() function
>   soc: fsl: guts: make it easier to determine on which SoC we are
>     running
> 
> Vladimir Oltean (5):
>   soc: fsl: guts: perform fsl_guts_init() error teardown in reverse
>     order of setup
>   soc: fsl: guts: make fsl_soc_data available after fsl_guts_init()
>   dt-bindings: fsl: layerscape-dcfg: define DCFG_DCSR region
>   soc: fsl: guts: implement the RCW override procedure
>   phy: lynx-10g: use RCW override procedure for dynamic protocol change

Even though I intended these changes for linux-phy (they are also
build-tested there), I'm fine either with these changes taken through
Vinod's tree with Christophe's ACK for patches 1-8, or through
Christophe's tree with Vinod's ACK for patch 9, really.

I see on Patchwork there's a minor issue in the commit message of patch 3/9:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-phy/patch/[email protected]/
"WARNING: 'struture' may be misspelled - perhaps 'structure'?"

Could this be fixed up while applying, if there is no other feedback?
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.