Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] powerpc: enable dynamic preemption
Shrikanth Hegde <[email protected]> Fri, 31 Jul 2026 13:32:27 +0530
| Newsgroups | org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi. On 7/31/26 12:48 PM, Jirka Hladky wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 7:03 AM Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP) > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Le 30/07/2026 à 19:10, Shrikanth Hegde a écrit : >>> Hi Jirka, Paul, >>> >>> >>> +cc will >>> >>> On 7/30/26 8:38 PM, Jirka Hladky wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 4:53 PM Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> But is this really a fundamental RISC cost? For example, does arm64 >>>>> see the same performance issues? >>>> >>>> We tested arm64 (Ampere Altra Max) with the same controlled >>>> experiment -- two 6.18 kernels, both voluntary, differing only in >>>> PREEMPT_DYNAMIC: >>>> >>>> Arch PREEMPT_DYNAMIC kill bogo-ops/sec Delta >>>> ------- --------------- ----------------- ----- >>>> ppc64le off 108,836 >>>> ppc64le on 68,197 -37.3% >>>> aarch64 off 5,538 >>>> aarch64 on 5,082 -8.2% >>>> >>>> arm64 sees -8.2% vs ppc64le's -37.3%. So arm64 is affected but >>>> much less severely. >>> >>> Ouch!. But that's good to know. >> >> Might be a stupid question, but what is your .config ? >> Are you sure it doesn't contain CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT ? > > I have double-checked that and it's not set: > # CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT is not set > > Thanks > Jirka > Coming into numbers, I did notice later, arm64 numbers are almost 20x less. I believe you are having similar core count or benchmark is same. But if we compare the time taken for each operations, it tells a different story. PREEMPT_DYNAMIC ppc64le off 108836 ops/s = 9.19 us/op ppc64le on 68197 ops/s = 14.66 us/op delta +5.47 us/op aarch64 off 5538 ops/s = 180.57 us/op aarch64 on 5082 ops/s = 196.77 us/op delta +16.20 us/op PS: I tried porting some of those changes in arm64 to powerpc to split preempt count into two. but i don;t see much improvement there. If i see get better numbers i will reply with that.