Re: [PATCH 0/6] powerpc/spufs: assorted fixes

On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 11:28:46AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2026, at 17:51, Junrui Luo via B4 Relay wrote:
> >
> > Patches 1-5 are tagged for stable. 6/6 is deliberately not: it changes =
the
> > atomicity of multi-element mailbox transfers rather than just adding a
> > check, so it seems better to let it soak in mainline first.
> >
> > Build-tested only. I have no Cell or PS3 hardware, so none of this has
> > been exercised at runtime.
>=20
> These are all reasonable fixes as far as I can tell, but I'm missing
> information about why you care about spufs. If you used some atomated
> tooling, please add some reference to what you used.
>=20
>        Arnd

Hi Arnd,

We're working on a paper on LLM-assisted vulnerability research. spufs
was just picked at random as one of the modules to look at. The tooling
is an agent we developed ourselves. Should we add an Assisted-by tag in
v2?

Thanks,
Junrui Luo=