Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] powerpc/perf: Add power12 Base Performance Monitoring support
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-08-04 01:02:49 Tue, Amit Machhiwal wrote: > On 2026/08/03 09:27 PM, Mahesh Salgaonkar wrote: > > From: Athira Rajeev <[email protected]> > > > > Base enablement patch to register performance monitoring hardware > > support for power12. Patch introduce the raw event encoding format, > > defines the supported list of events, config fields for the event > > attributes and their corresponding bit values which are exported via > > sysfs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Mahesh Salgaonkar <[email protected]> > > Tested-by: Praveen K Pandey <[email protected]> > > --- > > Change in v2: > > - Fix typo reported by Nikhil > > --- > > arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile | 2 +- > > arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 2 + > > arch/powerpc/perf/internal.h | 1 + > > arch/powerpc/perf/power12-events-list.h | 78 ++++ > > arch/powerpc/perf/power12-pmu.c | 466 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 5 files changed, 548 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/perf/power12-events-list.h > > create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/perf/power12-pmu.c > > > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile > > index 78dd7e25219ee..bcc804c413381 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/Makefile > > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_PERF_CTRS) += core-book3s.o > > obj64-$(CONFIG_PPC_PERF_CTRS) += ppc970-pmu.o power5-pmu.o \ > > power5+-pmu.o power6-pmu.o power7-pmu.o \ > > isa207-common.o power8-pmu.o power9-pmu.o \ > > - generic-compat-pmu.o power10-pmu.o bhrb.o > > + generic-compat-pmu.o power10-pmu.o bhrb.o power12-pmu.o > > Minor: Line exceeds 80 columns (with tabs expanded). Please wrap > power12-pmu.o onto its own continuation line aligned with the entries > above it. As I mentioned in my response to previous patch, 80 column is no more hard limit. Thanks, -Mahesh.