Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] parisc: Drop own implementations for ptep_get() and ptep_test_and_clear_young()

Helge Deller <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-fsdevel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-parisc,org.kvack.linux-mm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 8/4/26 14:42, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 01:34:41PM +0100, Pedro Falcato wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 12:11:08PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 03, 2026 at 05:43:56PM +0100, Pedro Falcato wrote:
>>>> From: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> Switch to the generic implementations, which are identical.
>>>
>>> You sure do like succinct commit messages :)
>>
>> I didn't even write this one! See the From: :))
> 
> Lol well then feedback addressed to Helge ;)

Noted :-)

>>> Maybe worth saying by dropping the __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_TEST_AND_CLEAR_YOUNG and
>>> ptep_get defines you get the generic versions from include/pgtable.h which are
>>> functionally identical.

Isn't that basically the same as:
"Switch to the generic implementations, which are identical."
;-)

>> I can touch it up though, if you insist.
> 
> Yeah, I'm being pedantic here it's not vital to have this change :) but be nice
> if you could, I'm sure Helge probably wouldn't mind too much? :)

Yes, I'm fine with any cleanup/rephrasing of the commit message.
Thanks!
Helge

>>> (Being pedantic, they're not quite strictly identical as the
>>> ptep_test_and_clear_young() generic function does some weird unnecessary
>>> indirection with a local variable and the single {} is dropped etc.)
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.