Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] Add perf.data tracepoint events to trace.dat conversion

Tanushree Shah <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.ozlabs.lists.linuxppc-dev,org.kernel.vger.linux-perf-users
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thank you Ian for the review, glad it looks good!

Thanks,
Tanushree Shah

On 05/08/26 07:57, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 7:07 PM Ian Rogers <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 2, 2026 at 11:08 AM Tanushree Shah <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...
>>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/[email protected]/
>>
>> Thanks again Tanushree for pursuing this. I see on sashiko.dev that
>> sashiko couldn't review the v2 patches because they failed to apply:
>> https://sashiko.dev/#/log/baseline/53604/2
>> The SHA of perf-tools-next that sashiko.dev was trying was
>> d04ef71492fad7230d474efe33d05f4c0563d409, which corresponds to "perf
>> machine: Check snprintf truncation for guest kallsyms path," added 4
>> days ago:
>> https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/perf/perf-tools-next.git/commit/?h=perf-tools-next&id=d04ef71492fad7230d474efe33d05f4c0563d409
>> Could you rebase the patches so that we can benefit from the Sashiko review?
> 
> Fwiw, I went through the individual patches in case I could give some
> useful early feedback. Everything looks great, and thanks for adding
> the test!
> 
> Thanks,
> Ian
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.