RE: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-of-aspeed : Add ast2700 support

Ryan Chen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.ozlabs.lists.openbmc,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-mmc,org.ozlabs.lists.linux-aspeed
Message-ID <TY2PPF5CB9A1BE688A53DE6D5CBEC46CE94F240A@TY2PPF5CB9A1BE6.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-of-aspeed : Add ast2700
> support
> 
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 01:27:56PM +0800, Ryan Chen wrote:
> > Add the "aspeed,ast2700-sd-controller" compatible. The ast2700 sdhci
> > controller requires an reset, so make the "resets" property mandatory
> > for this compatible to reflect the hardware requirement.
> 
> Subject - there is never space before ':'
Will update
dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-of-aspeed: Add ast2700 support
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ryan Chen <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/aspeed,sdhci.yaml | 16
> > ++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/aspeed,sdhci.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/aspeed,sdhci.yaml
> > index d24950ccea95..a2ff9a94db13 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/aspeed,sdhci.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/aspeed,sdhci.yaml
> > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ properties:
> >        - aspeed,ast2400-sd-controller
> >        - aspeed,ast2500-sd-controller
> >        - aspeed,ast2600-sd-controller
> > +      - aspeed,ast2700-sd-controller
> 
> Missing blank lines everywhere in your patchset.
Will add blank lines.
> 
> >    reg:
> >      maxItems: 1
> >      description: Common configuration registers @@ -37,6 +38,20 @@
> > properties:
> >    clocks:
> >      maxItems: 1
> >      description: The SD/SDIO controller clock gate
> 
> Blank line
Will add blank lines.
> 
> > +  resets:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> 
> Blank line, just open any other bindings. If this is because you used LLM, then
> obviously NAK, because we should not waste time to review unsupervised poor
> quality LLM output. It is your task to review it, not ours.
Will add blank lines.

When I submit, I did checkpatch.pl and also 
DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/aspeed,sdhci.yaml
make dt_binding_check W=1 didn’t see error, I will review it again. 

Thanks your review.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.