Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] dt-bindings: mfd: aspeed,ast2x00-scu: Describe AST2700 SCU0

Rob Herring <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.ozlabs.lists.openbmc,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-clk,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-gpio,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.ozlabs.lists.linux-aspeed
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 06:14:06AM +0000, Billy Tsai wrote:
> > > AST2700 consists of two interconnected SoC instances, each with its own
> > > System Control Unit (SCU). The SCU0 provides pin control, interrupt
> > > controllers, clocks, resets, and address-space mappings for the
> > > Secondary and Tertiary Service Processors (SSP and TSP).
> > >
> > > Describe the SSP/TSP address mappings using the standard
> > > memory-region and memory-region-names properties.
> > >
> > > Disallow legacy child nodes that are not present on AST2700, including
> > > p2a-control and smp-memram. The latter is unnecessary as software can
> > > access the scratch registers via the SCU syscon.
> > >
> > > Also allow the AST2700 SoC0 pin controller to be described as a child
> > > node of the SCU0, and add an example illustrating the SCU0 layout,
> > > including reserved-memory, interrupt controllers, and pinctrl.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Billy Tsai <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >  .../bindings/mfd/aspeed,ast2x00-scu.yaml           | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 117 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed,ast2x00-scu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed,ast2x00-scu.yaml
> > > index a87f31fce019..86d51389689c 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed,ast2x00-scu.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/aspeed,ast2x00-scu.yaml
> > > @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ properties:
> > >    '#reset-cells':
> > >      const: 1
> > >
> > > +  memory-region: true
> > > +  memory-region-names: true
> 
> > Missing constraints. From where did you take such syntax (so I can fix
> > it)?
> 
> The intention was to constrain these properties conditionally for
> AST2700 SCU0 as done further down in the patch.
> 
> I can update the binding so that memory-region and memory-region-names
> have baseline constraints (e.g. minItems and maxItems), and then refine them in the
> conditional branches for AST2700SCU0, AST2700SCU1 and others
> 
>   memory-region:
>     minItems: 2
>     maxItems: 3
>   memory-region-names:
>     minItems: 2
>     maxItems: 3

As of this patch, you don't need that. You can just define the regions 
and names at the top-level. And the conditional schema only needs to 
disallow them for the appropriate case.

Rob
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.