Re: Possible race during OP-TEE kernel module device probing

Jens Wiklander <[email protected]> Mon, 30 Mar 2026 11:16:59 +0200
Newsgroups org.trustedfirmware.lists.op-tee
Message-ID <CAHUa44EcGEoBcx2J4dOJOSNjE7E9=qCivdfJtFzgrHmqKKB8Fg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,

On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 6:07 AM Shf Chen (陳少甫) via OP-TEE
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2026-03-27 at 15:31 +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 09:01:15AM +0000, Shf Chen (陳少甫) via OP-TEE wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We found a possible race condition issue during OP-TEE kernel driver probing the device.
> > > A NULL pointer dereference exception can happen when another kernel driver open OP-TEE context
> > > with tee_client_open_context() then do a SMC call to OP-TEE.
> > > Below is the exception:
> >
> > How is your kernel driver being probed? Have you registered it as a
> > proper TEE bus driver? Any custom ways to invoke TEE kernel client APIs
> > are surely susceptible to races like the one you mentioned below.
> >
> > -Sumit
>
> Hi,
>
> Our kernel driver does not registered as a TEE bus driver for some reasons,
> and we need to use other API to ensure the OP-TEE driver is probed to
> workaround this issue. But, we think this is error-prone for module developer
> that need to call to OP-TEE.
>
> Although this is not the case, I think that after calling tee_device_register(),
> the optee device is shown under `/dev/` filesystem. There is a very small chance
> for userspace program to trigger this race condition, and they don't have clue on
> whether the device is properly being probed yet.

I think you're on to something. After calling tee_device_register(),
the driver must be able to handle requests, at least without crashing.
optee_enumerate_devices() requires the devices to be registered, so
that must happen after those calls. But other than that, I think the
calls to  tee_device_register() should be the last thing in the probe
function.

Sumit, do you agree?

Cheers,
Jens

>
> Best regards,
> Shao-Fu Chen
>
> >
> > >
> > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000
> > > Mem abort info:
> > >   ESR = 0x0000000096000005
> > >   EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
> > >   SET = 0, FnV = 0
> > >   EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
> > >   FSC = 0x05: level 1 translation fault
> > > Data abort info:
> > >   ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005, ISS2 = 0x00000000
> > >   CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
> > >   GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0
> > > user pgtable: 4k pages, 39-bit VAs, pgdp=00000001026bb000
> > > [0000000000000000] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000, pud=0000000000000000
> > > Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> > > Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func
> > > pstate: 03400005 (nzcv daif +PAN -UAO +TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> > > pc : optee_cq_wait_init+0x78/0x124 [optee]
> > > lr : optee_cq_wait_init+0x60/0x124 [optee]
> > > sp : ffffffc081fcb7f0
> > > x29: ffffffc081fcb7f0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 0000000000001000
> > > x26: ffffff8080e42c60 x25: ffffff8084d46040 x24: 0000000000000000
> > > x23: 0000000000000000 x22: ffffffc081fcb8c0 x21: ffffffc081fcb8a8
> > > x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffffff8082741570 x18: ffffffe572f8ca00
> > > x17: 00000000fa28650f x16: 00000000fa28650f x15: ffffff8084d47000
> > > x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000084d47000
> > > x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000032000012 x9 : 04d4600000000001
> > > x8 : ffffffc081fcb8c8 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 000000000000003f
> > > x5 : ffffff83c86649e0 x4 : 0000000000000008 x3 : 0000000000000000
> > > x2 : ffffff80827415a0 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffffffc081fcb8c0
> > > Call trace:
> > >  optee_cq_wait_init+0x78/0x124 [optee f6dbc35f8d96acbe1f3c329d72018151d796208d]
> > >  optee_smc_do_call_with_arg+0x12c/0x95c [optee f6dbc35f8d96acbe1f3c329d72018151d796208d]
> > >  optee_shm_register+0x284/0x360 [optee f6dbc35f8d96acbe1f3c329d72018151d796208d]
> > >  register_shm_helper+0x1a4/0x2f4 [tee cdd8a0d077d984bda1f31f9e8903836edbe46603]
> > >  tee_shm_register_kernel_buf+0x60/0x90 [tee cdd8a0d077d984bda1f31f9e8903836edbe46603]
> > >  cmdq_sec_allocate_wsm+0x58/0xc4 [mtk_cmdq_sec_mbox ac82dc958e32252a21c6ce55bb8839ebb288387a]
> > >  cmdq_sec_probe+0x80/0x4a0 [mtk_cmdq_sec_mbox ac82dc958e32252a21c6ce55bb8839ebb288387a]
> > >
> > > We found the optee->call_queue hasn't been initialized when our driver called OP-TEE,
> > > and it might have some issues about the device data structure initialize order in
> > > optee_probe()[drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c]:
> > >
> > > ---
> > > rc = tee_device_register(optee->teedev);  // <----- TEE device register here
> > > if (rc)
> > >     goto err_unreg_supp_teedev;
> > >
> > > rc = tee_device_register(optee->supp_teedev);
> > > if (rc)
> > >     goto err_unreg_supp_teedev;
> > >
> > > optee_cq_init(&optee->call_queue, thread_count);  // <----- Some data structures are initialized afterwards
> > > optee_supp_init(&optee->supp);
> > > optee->smc.memremaped_shm = memremaped_shm;
> > > optee->pool = pool;
> > > optee_shm_arg_cache_init(optee, arg_cache_flags);
> > > mutex_init(&optee->rpmb_dev_mutex);
> > > ---
> > >
> > > We want to ask if the data structure initialization should be done before the tee device registration?
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Shao-Fu Chen
> > >
> > >
>