Re: Possible race during OP-TEE kernel module device probing
Jens Wiklander <[email protected]> Mon, 30 Mar 2026 11:16:59 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.trustedfirmware.lists.op-tee |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHUa44EcGEoBcx2J4dOJOSNjE7E9=qCivdfJtFzgrHmqKKB8Fg@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi, On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 6:07 AM Shf Chen (陳少甫) via OP-TEE <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2026-03-27 at 15:31 +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 09:01:15AM +0000, Shf Chen (陳少甫) via OP-TEE wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > We found a possible race condition issue during OP-TEE kernel driver probing the device. > > > A NULL pointer dereference exception can happen when another kernel driver open OP-TEE context > > > with tee_client_open_context() then do a SMC call to OP-TEE. > > > Below is the exception: > > > > How is your kernel driver being probed? Have you registered it as a > > proper TEE bus driver? Any custom ways to invoke TEE kernel client APIs > > are surely susceptible to races like the one you mentioned below. > > > > -Sumit > > Hi, > > Our kernel driver does not registered as a TEE bus driver for some reasons, > and we need to use other API to ensure the OP-TEE driver is probed to > workaround this issue. But, we think this is error-prone for module developer > that need to call to OP-TEE. > > Although this is not the case, I think that after calling tee_device_register(), > the optee device is shown under `/dev/` filesystem. There is a very small chance > for userspace program to trigger this race condition, and they don't have clue on > whether the device is properly being probed yet. I think you're on to something. After calling tee_device_register(), the driver must be able to handle requests, at least without crashing. optee_enumerate_devices() requires the devices to be registered, so that must happen after those calls. But other than that, I think the calls to tee_device_register() should be the last thing in the probe function. Sumit, do you agree? Cheers, Jens > > Best regards, > Shao-Fu Chen > > > > > > > > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 > > > Mem abort info: > > > ESR = 0x0000000096000005 > > > EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits > > > SET = 0, FnV = 0 > > > EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 > > > FSC = 0x05: level 1 translation fault > > > Data abort info: > > > ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005, ISS2 = 0x00000000 > > > CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 > > > GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 > > > user pgtable: 4k pages, 39-bit VAs, pgdp=00000001026bb000 > > > [0000000000000000] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000, pud=0000000000000000 > > > Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP > > > Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func > > > pstate: 03400005 (nzcv daif +PAN -UAO +TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) > > > pc : optee_cq_wait_init+0x78/0x124 [optee] > > > lr : optee_cq_wait_init+0x60/0x124 [optee] > > > sp : ffffffc081fcb7f0 > > > x29: ffffffc081fcb7f0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 0000000000001000 > > > x26: ffffff8080e42c60 x25: ffffff8084d46040 x24: 0000000000000000 > > > x23: 0000000000000000 x22: ffffffc081fcb8c0 x21: ffffffc081fcb8a8 > > > x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffffff8082741570 x18: ffffffe572f8ca00 > > > x17: 00000000fa28650f x16: 00000000fa28650f x15: ffffff8084d47000 > > > x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000084d47000 > > > x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000032000012 x9 : 04d4600000000001 > > > x8 : ffffffc081fcb8c8 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 000000000000003f > > > x5 : ffffff83c86649e0 x4 : 0000000000000008 x3 : 0000000000000000 > > > x2 : ffffff80827415a0 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffffffc081fcb8c0 > > > Call trace: > > > optee_cq_wait_init+0x78/0x124 [optee f6dbc35f8d96acbe1f3c329d72018151d796208d] > > > optee_smc_do_call_with_arg+0x12c/0x95c [optee f6dbc35f8d96acbe1f3c329d72018151d796208d] > > > optee_shm_register+0x284/0x360 [optee f6dbc35f8d96acbe1f3c329d72018151d796208d] > > > register_shm_helper+0x1a4/0x2f4 [tee cdd8a0d077d984bda1f31f9e8903836edbe46603] > > > tee_shm_register_kernel_buf+0x60/0x90 [tee cdd8a0d077d984bda1f31f9e8903836edbe46603] > > > cmdq_sec_allocate_wsm+0x58/0xc4 [mtk_cmdq_sec_mbox ac82dc958e32252a21c6ce55bb8839ebb288387a] > > > cmdq_sec_probe+0x80/0x4a0 [mtk_cmdq_sec_mbox ac82dc958e32252a21c6ce55bb8839ebb288387a] > > > > > > We found the optee->call_queue hasn't been initialized when our driver called OP-TEE, > > > and it might have some issues about the device data structure initialize order in > > > optee_probe()[drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c]: > > > > > > --- > > > rc = tee_device_register(optee->teedev); // <----- TEE device register here > > > if (rc) > > > goto err_unreg_supp_teedev; > > > > > > rc = tee_device_register(optee->supp_teedev); > > > if (rc) > > > goto err_unreg_supp_teedev; > > > > > > optee_cq_init(&optee->call_queue, thread_count); // <----- Some data structures are initialized afterwards > > > optee_supp_init(&optee->supp); > > > optee->smc.memremaped_shm = memremaped_shm; > > > optee->pool = pool; > > > optee_shm_arg_cache_init(optee, arg_cache_flags); > > > mutex_init(&optee->rpmb_dev_mutex); > > > --- > > > > > > We want to ask if the data structure initialization should be done before the tee device registration? > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Shao-Fu Chen > > > > > > >