Re: [PATCH] tee: qcomtee: add missing va_end in early return qcomtee_object_user_init()

Amirreza Zarrabi via OP-TEE <[email protected]> Fri, 15 May 2026 11:23:32 +1000
Newsgroups org.trustedfirmware.lists.op-tee,dev.linux.lists.linux-kernel-mentees,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

On 5/13/2026 7:10 PM, Robertus Diawan Chris wrote:
> qcomtee_object_user_init() is a variadic function and when the function
> return because there's no dispatch callback in QCOMTEE_OBJECT_TYPE_CB
> case, there's no va_end to cleanup "ap" object initialized by va_start
> and that can cause undefined behavior. So make sure to use va_end before
> returning the error code when there's no dispatch callback.
> 
> This is reported by Coverity Scan as "Missing varargs init or cleanup".
> 
> Fixes: d6e290837e50 ("tee: add Qualcomm TEE driver")
> Signed-off-by: Robertus Diawan Chris <[email protected]>
> ---
> I don't have the device, so I am not sure how to test this change.
> Thank you.
> 
>  drivers/tee/qcomtee/core.c | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tee/qcomtee/core.c b/drivers/tee/qcomtee/core.c
> index b1cb50e434f0..901a31e8201f 100644
> --- a/drivers/tee/qcomtee/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/tee/qcomtee/core.c
> @@ -306,8 +306,10 @@ int qcomtee_object_user_init(struct qcomtee_object *object,
>  		break;
>  	case QCOMTEE_OBJECT_TYPE_CB:
>  		object->ops = ops;
> -		if (!object->ops->dispatch)
> -			return -EINVAL;
> +		if (!object->ops->dispatch) {
> +			ret = -EINVAL;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
>  
>  		/* If failed, "no-name". */
>  		object->name = kvasprintf_const(GFP_KERNEL, fmt, ap);
> @@ -320,6 +322,8 @@ int qcomtee_object_user_init(struct qcomtee_object *object,
>  	default:
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
>  	}
> +
> +out:
>  	va_end(ap);
>  
>  	return ret;
> 
> base-commit: 5d6919055dec134de3c40167a490f33c74c12581

Reviewed-by: Amirreza Zarrabi <[email protected]>

Thanks.
Amir