Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] optee: ffa: Add NULL check in optee_ffa_lend_protmem
Jens Wiklander <[email protected]> Mon, 8 Jun 2026 15:16:49 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.trustedfirmware.lists.op-tee,dev.linux.lists.kvmarm,org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHUa44FO02DKqqNeFuRfx8bQjwcNRfPMF2=8MdjMUFp6vYUpNw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 2:01 PM Sebastian Ene <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 03:19:29PM +0000, Mostafa Saleh wrote: > > Sashiko (locally) reports a possible null dereference under memory > > pressure due to the lack of validation of the allocated pointer. > > > > Fix that by adding the missing check. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mostafa Saleh <[email protected]> > > --- > > drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c b/drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c > > index b4372fa268d0..633715b98625 100644 > > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c > > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/ffa_abi.c > > @@ -698,6 +698,9 @@ static int optee_ffa_lend_protmem(struct optee *optee, struct tee_shm *protmem, > > int rc; > > > > mem_attr = kzalloc_objs(*mem_attr, ma_count); > > + if (!mem_attr) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > for (n = 0; n < ma_count; n++) { > > mem_attr[n].receiver = mem_attrs[n] & U16_MAX; > > mem_attr[n].attrs = mem_attrs[n] >> 16; > > -- > > 2.54.0.746.g67dd491aae-goog > > > > Thanks for fixing this and for including my other patches in the series > Reviewed-by: Sebastian Ene <[email protected]> Please add a Fixes: tag. This patch is independent of the others in the patch set, so if you send it alone with the Fixes: tag I'll pick it up. Cheers, Jens