Re: [PATCH v4 05/15] remoteproc: qcom_q6v5_pas: Switch over to generic PAS TZ APIs
Mukesh Ojha via OP-TEE <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Apr 2026 18:55:12 +0530
| Newsgroups | org.trustedfirmware.lists.op-tee,org.freedesktop.lists.dri-devel,org.infradead.lists.ath12k,org.kernel.vger.linux-arm-msm,org.kernel.vger.linux-devicetree,org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel,org.kernel.vger.linux-media,org.kernel.vger.linux-remoteproc,org.kernel.vger.linux-wireless,org.kernel.vger.netdev |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 03:25:53PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote: > From: Sumit Garg <[email protected]> > > Switch qcom_q6v5_pas client driver over to generic PAS TZ APIs. Generic PAS > TZ service allows to support multiple TZ implementation backends like QTEE > based SCM PAS service, OP-TEE based PAS service and any further future TZ > backend service. > > Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 51 +++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c > index da27d1d3c9da..847249c28c1b 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > #include <linux/pm_domain.h> > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > +#include <linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_pas.h> > #include <linux/firmware/qcom/qcom_scm.h> Can you check do we really need this header ? > #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h> > #include <linux/remoteproc.h> > @@ -118,8 +119,8 @@ struct qcom_pas { > struct qcom_rproc_ssr ssr_subdev; > struct qcom_sysmon *sysmon; > > - struct qcom_scm_pas_context *pas_ctx; > - struct qcom_scm_pas_context *dtb_pas_ctx; > + struct qcom_pas_context *pas_ctx; > + struct qcom_pas_context *dtb_pas_ctx; > }; > > static void qcom_pas_segment_dump(struct rproc *rproc, > @@ -196,7 +197,7 @@ static int qcom_pas_shutdown_poll_decrypt(struct qcom_pas *pas) > > do { > msleep(QCOM_PAS_DECRYPT_SHUTDOWN_DELAY_MS); > - ret = qcom_scm_pas_shutdown(pas->pas_id); > + ret = qcom_pas_shutdown(pas->pas_id); > } while (ret == -EINVAL && --retry_num); > > return ret; > @@ -212,9 +213,9 @@ static int qcom_pas_unprepare(struct rproc *rproc) > * auth_and_reset() was successful, but in other cases clean it up > * here. > */ > - qcom_scm_pas_metadata_release(pas->pas_ctx); > + qcom_pas_metadata_release(pas->pas_ctx); > if (pas->dtb_pas_id) > - qcom_scm_pas_metadata_release(pas->dtb_pas_ctx); > + qcom_pas_metadata_release(pas->dtb_pas_ctx); > > return 0; > } > @@ -228,9 +229,9 @@ static int qcom_pas_load(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) > pas->firmware = fw; > > if (pas->lite_pas_id) > - qcom_scm_pas_shutdown(pas->lite_pas_id); > + qcom_pas_shutdown(pas->lite_pas_id); > if (pas->lite_dtb_pas_id) > - qcom_scm_pas_shutdown(pas->lite_dtb_pas_id); > + qcom_pas_shutdown(pas->lite_dtb_pas_id); > > if (pas->dtb_pas_id) { > ret = request_firmware(&pas->dtb_firmware, pas->dtb_firmware_name, pas->dev); > @@ -250,7 +251,7 @@ static int qcom_pas_load(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw) > return 0; > > release_dtb_metadata: > - qcom_scm_pas_metadata_release(pas->dtb_pas_ctx); > + qcom_pas_metadata_release(pas->dtb_pas_ctx); > release_firmware(pas->dtb_firmware); > > return ret; > @@ -310,7 +311,7 @@ static int qcom_pas_start(struct rproc *rproc) > if (ret) > goto disable_px_supply; > > - ret = qcom_scm_pas_prepare_and_auth_reset(pas->dtb_pas_ctx); > + ret = qcom_pas_prepare_and_auth_reset(pas->dtb_pas_ctx); > if (ret) { > dev_err(pas->dev, > "failed to authenticate dtb image and release reset\n"); > @@ -329,7 +330,7 @@ static int qcom_pas_start(struct rproc *rproc) > if (ret) > goto release_pas_metadata; > > - ret = qcom_scm_pas_prepare_and_auth_reset(pas->pas_ctx); > + ret = qcom_pas_prepare_and_auth_reset(pas->pas_ctx); > if (ret) { > dev_err(pas->dev, > "failed to authenticate image and release reset\n"); > @@ -339,13 +340,13 @@ static int qcom_pas_start(struct rproc *rproc) > ret = qcom_q6v5_wait_for_start(&pas->q6v5, msecs_to_jiffies(5000)); > if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT) { > dev_err(pas->dev, "start timed out\n"); > - qcom_scm_pas_shutdown(pas->pas_id); > + qcom_pas_shutdown(pas->pas_id); > goto unmap_carveout; > } > > - qcom_scm_pas_metadata_release(pas->pas_ctx); > + qcom_pas_metadata_release(pas->pas_ctx); > if (pas->dtb_pas_id) > - qcom_scm_pas_metadata_release(pas->dtb_pas_ctx); > + qcom_pas_metadata_release(pas->dtb_pas_ctx); > > /* firmware is used to pass reference from qcom_pas_start(), drop it now */ > pas->firmware = NULL; > @@ -355,9 +356,9 @@ static int qcom_pas_start(struct rproc *rproc) > unmap_carveout: > qcom_pas_unmap_carveout(rproc, pas->mem_phys, pas->mem_size); > release_pas_metadata: > - qcom_scm_pas_metadata_release(pas->pas_ctx); > + qcom_pas_metadata_release(pas->pas_ctx); > if (pas->dtb_pas_id) > - qcom_scm_pas_metadata_release(pas->dtb_pas_ctx); > + qcom_pas_metadata_release(pas->dtb_pas_ctx); > > unmap_dtb_carveout: > if (pas->dtb_pas_id) > @@ -406,7 +407,7 @@ static int qcom_pas_stop(struct rproc *rproc) > if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT) > dev_err(pas->dev, "timed out on wait\n"); > > - ret = qcom_scm_pas_shutdown(pas->pas_id); > + ret = qcom_pas_shutdown(pas->pas_id); > if (ret && pas->decrypt_shutdown) > ret = qcom_pas_shutdown_poll_decrypt(pas); > > @@ -414,7 +415,7 @@ static int qcom_pas_stop(struct rproc *rproc) > dev_err(pas->dev, "failed to shutdown: %d\n", ret); > > if (pas->dtb_pas_id) { > - ret = qcom_scm_pas_shutdown(pas->dtb_pas_id); > + ret = qcom_pas_shutdown(pas->dtb_pas_id); > if (ret) > dev_err(pas->dev, "failed to shutdown dtb: %d\n", ret); > > @@ -484,11 +485,11 @@ static int qcom_pas_parse_firmware(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *f > * > * Here, we call rproc_elf_load_rsc_table() to check firmware binary has resources > * or not and if it is not having then we pass NULL and zero as input resource > - * table pointer and size respectively to the argument of qcom_scm_pas_get_rsc_table() > + * table pointer and size respectively to the argument of qcom_pas_get_rsc_table() > * and this is even true for Qualcomm remote processor who does follow remoteproc > * framework. > */ > - output_rt = qcom_scm_pas_get_rsc_table(pas->pas_ctx, table, table_sz, &output_rt_size); > + output_rt = qcom_pas_get_rsc_table(pas->pas_ctx, table, table_sz, &output_rt_size); > ret = IS_ERR(output_rt) ? PTR_ERR(output_rt) : 0; > if (ret) { > dev_err(pas->dev, "Error in getting resource table: %d\n", ret); > @@ -746,7 +747,7 @@ static int qcom_pas_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (!desc) > return -EINVAL; > > - if (!qcom_scm_is_available()) > + if (!qcom_pas_is_available()) > return -EPROBE_DEFER; > > fw_name = desc->firmware_name; > @@ -838,16 +839,16 @@ static int qcom_pas_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > qcom_add_ssr_subdev(rproc, &pas->ssr_subdev, desc->ssr_name); > > - pas->pas_ctx = devm_qcom_scm_pas_context_alloc(pas->dev, pas->pas_id, > - pas->mem_phys, pas->mem_size); > + pas->pas_ctx = devm_qcom_pas_context_alloc(pas->dev, pas->pas_id, > + pas->mem_phys, pas->mem_size); > if (IS_ERR(pas->pas_ctx)) { > ret = PTR_ERR(pas->pas_ctx); > goto remove_ssr_sysmon; > } > > - pas->dtb_pas_ctx = devm_qcom_scm_pas_context_alloc(pas->dev, pas->dtb_pas_id, > - pas->dtb_mem_phys, > - pas->dtb_mem_size); > + pas->dtb_pas_ctx = devm_qcom_pas_context_alloc(pas->dev, pas->dtb_pas_id, > + pas->dtb_mem_phys, > + pas->dtb_mem_size); > if (IS_ERR(pas->dtb_pas_ctx)) { > ret = PTR_ERR(pas->dtb_pas_ctx); > goto remove_ssr_sysmon; > -- > 2.51.0 > Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <[email protected]> -- -Mukesh Ojha