Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: Extend the real-time hardware bits with some firmware bits

Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.trustedfirmware.lists.op-tee,dev.linux.lists.linux-rt-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-efi
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2026-08-13 09:28:08 [-0600], Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > A gentle ping.
> >
> > On 2026-07-18 19:50:41 [+0200], To [email protected] wrote:
> >> I have been reviewing how OP‑TEE is implemented and how secure‑world
> >> invocations behave. The goal was to determine whether an OP‑TEE call can
> >> delay the Linux side and introduce latency depending on the time spent
> >> in the secure world.
> 
> With RT stuff, I never know when something is deemed ready, or whether I
> should be the one to pick it up...  I have gone ahead and applied this
> one, hopefully that was the right thing to do :)

Thank you. RT wise there is no dedicated tree so I always rely on the
upstream maintainer to apply my bits.

Here, for v1 I wasn't entirely sure if what I wrote was entirely correct
but then Ilias and Jens gave me a few crumbs and I am confident that the
document reflects the reality :)

> Thanks,
> 
> jon

Sebastian
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.