Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: Extend the real-time hardware bits with some firmware bits
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.trustedfirmware.lists.op-tee,dev.linux.lists.linux-rt-devel,org.kernel.vger.linux-doc,org.kernel.vger.linux-efi |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2026-08-13 09:28:08 [-0600], Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> writes: > > > A gentle ping. > > > > On 2026-07-18 19:50:41 [+0200], To [email protected] wrote: > >> I have been reviewing how OP‑TEE is implemented and how secure‑world > >> invocations behave. The goal was to determine whether an OP‑TEE call can > >> delay the Linux side and introduce latency depending on the time spent > >> in the secure world. > > With RT stuff, I never know when something is deemed ready, or whether I > should be the one to pick it up... I have gone ahead and applied this > one, hopefully that was the right thing to do :) Thank you. RT wise there is no dedicated tree so I always rely on the upstream maintainer to apply my bits. Here, for v1 I wasn't entirely sure if what I wrote was entirely correct but then Ilias and Jens gave me a few crumbs and I am confident that the document reflects the reality :) > Thanks, > > jon Sebastian