Re: [v2,0/5] gpio: improve claim diagnostics and fix gpio-delay offset handling
Simon Glass <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.u-boot-project.lists.u-boot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFLszTgSKL4SRDOpej4-rd2CPtNuLVbA=L9yfCLhy9_g5E9ihg@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Pranav, On 2026-07-29T08:12:14, Pranav Sanwal <[email protected]> wrote: > Changes in v2: Could you also add sandbox coverage for gpio-delay ? You shoud add a gpio-delay node to the sandbox test devicetree wrapping at least two real lines, plus a test in test/dm/gpio.c that requests both consumers and toggles them? That would cover the offset-propagation fix in patch 4, the gpio_count/bounds fix in patch 3, and - via dm_leak_check - the remove-path fix in patch 5, all of which are otherwise not covered by tests and might break at any time. Regards, Simon