Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] rockchip: rk3399: Add ROC-PC-PLUS board detection
Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.u-boot-project.lists.u-boot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOMZO5DULY0wE_U-4aX9sfrnum++J9iJ02_H8L+g3qdY156KCA@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Quentin, On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 8:55 AM Quentin Schulz <[email protected]> wrote: > Ideally, we should be able to automatically detect whether it's a > roc-pc-mezzanine-rk3399, but I couldn't find schematics for it and from > the Device Tree, there doesn't seem to be something we could use to > detect it like we do for ROC-PC-PLUS/ROC-PC. So instead I recommend to > check for CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(DM_I2C). If it ever gets enabled for > roc-pc-mezzanine-rk3399_defconfig, the logic will return that it's NOT a > ROC-PC-PLUS and thus use CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE which is > rockchip/rk3399-roc-pc-mezzanine.dtb which is correct. DM_I2C is also selected by roc-pc-mezzanine-rk3399_defconfig. We can use SPL_I2C to distinguish, like this: --- a/board/firefly/roc-pc-rk3399/roc-pc-rk3399.c +++ b/board/firefly/roc-pc-rk3399/roc-pc-rk3399.c @@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ static bool is_roc_pc_plus(void) { struct udevice *bus, *dev; + /* roc-pc-mezzanine-rk3399_defconfig does not select SPL_I2C */ + if (!CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(SPL_I2C)) + return false; if (uclass_get_device_by_name(UCLASS_I2C, ROC_PC_MP8859_BUS, &bus)) return false; If you agree, I'll send a v5 with the change above included. Thanks