Re: [0/5] binman: add nxp_imx93cst etype for i.MX93 flash.bin signing

Simon Glass <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.u-boot-project.lists.u-boot
Message-ID <CAFLszTiAmCFn0pt6x6uNfHdG3YBz=AAHT257ArJQUBCpmZX-wA@mail.gmail.com> 
Hi Jérémie,

On 2026-08-14T17:07:09, Jérémie Dautheribes
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Patch 1: introduces the new etype
> Patch 2: updates the imx93-u-boot.dtsi description to include the new
> signing nodes
> Patches 3-4: documentation
> Patch 5: adds test coverage
[..]
> The implementation is largely derived from the existing i.MX8M support,
> since the two share much of the same signing infrastructure.

Given how close this is to nxp_imx8mcst, please say in the cover
letter whether you considered factoring out a common base class rather
than duplicating the etype, and why you decided against it.

Regards,
Simon
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.