Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: renesas: r906g032: handle pin subgroups
Ralph Siemsen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.u-boot-project.lists.u-boot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, Aug 15, 2026 at 12:00:23AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzn1.c
>>b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzn1.c
>>index fdc43c8e714..6c8d40e9639 100644
>>--- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzn1.c
>>+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzn1.c
>>@@ -298,11 +298,24 @@ static int rzn1_pinconf_set(struct rzn1_pinctrl_priv *priv, unsigned int pin,
>> static int rzn1_pinctrl_set_state(struct udevice *dev, struct udevice *config)
>> {
>> struct rzn1_pinctrl_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(dev);
>>+ struct udevice *child;
>> int size;
>> int ret;
>> u32 val;
>> u32 bias;
>>+ /*
>>+ * Handle subnodes recursively, so that pin groups work.
>>+ * Note that properties are *NOT* inherited from parent.
>>+ */
>>+ device_foreach_child(child, config) {
>>+ ret = rzn1_pinctrl_set_state(dev, child);
>Can there really be infinite nested subgroups , or are there always
>only groups with subgroups and that is where it ends ? Linux
>Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/renesas,rzn1-pinctrl.yaml
>makes it look like the later, so maybe the recursion is not necessary
>here, instead call device_foreach_child() { device_foreach_child() { ..
>} } to prevent the possibility of infinite recursion ?
Realistically there will only be groups with one level of subgroups.
Perhaps if there was a phandle it could go a few levels deeper.
Unbounded recursion is not really possible here unless:
- the device tree is infinitely deep, or
- there is a very serious bug in device_foreach_child()
As these both seem unlikely, I opted for the simple recursive call, but
I am happy to change it if you feel it is better.
Ralph