Re: [PATCH 3/3] MAINTAINERS: Remove references to not existing files
Quentin Schulz <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.u-boot-project.lists.u-boot,io.groups.u-boot-amlogic |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Michal, On 8/24/26 9:18 AM, Michal Simek wrote: > A number of file (F:) entries across the MAINTAINERS files pointed to > files or directories which had been renamed or removed over time. Drop > these stale references so that every F: entry resolves to an existing > path. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <[email protected]> > --- [...] > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3576/MAINTAINERS b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3576/MAINTAINERS > index 79cf9e97f70b..62c3ce765e0d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3576/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3576/MAINTAINERS > @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ F: configs/nanopi-m5-rk3576_defconfig > NANOPI-R76S-RK3576 > M: Jonas Karlman <[email protected]> > S: Maintained > -F: arch/arm/dts/rk3576-nanopi-r76s* This is a leftover from v1 which had a file there, but we merged the v2. See https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/[email protected]/ and https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/[email protected]/ For now we don't have U-Boot-specific additions to the upstream DTS for the NanoPi R76S but we could in the future, so having a wildcard like that would allow Jonas to be notified if one ever gets added. So it's not completely useless. No strong opinion on still deleting it or not. [...] > diff --git a/board/khadas/khadas-edge2-rk3588s/MAINTAINERS b/board/khadas/khadas-edge2-rk3588s/MAINTAINERS > index c43f469589dd..2e7f43042ba3 100644 > --- a/board/khadas/khadas-edge2-rk3588s/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/board/khadas/khadas-edge2-rk3588s/MAINTAINERS > @@ -3,4 +3,3 @@ M: Jacobe Zang <[email protected]> > S: Maintained > F: configs/khadas-edge2-rk3588s_defconfig > F: include/configs/khadas-edge2-rk3588s.h > -F: arch/arm/dts/rk3588s-khadas-edge2* Was never a file matching this path, even in earlier versions of the patch before it got merged. Same remark as for the NanoPi R76S above. So this looks fine for Rockchip boards (+ the changes requested by Johan). Cheers, Quentin