Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] xen/console: reduce number of printouts in __printk_ratelimit()

[email protected]
Newsgroups org.xenproject.lists.xen-devel
Message-ID <alrlAq2/8HHkL8ty@kraken>
On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 05:49:35PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.07.2026 22:19, [email protected] wrote:
> > From: Denis Mukhin <[email protected]> 
> > 
> > Fold several __putstr() calls into one around notification of how many
> > messages have been rate-limited.
> > 
> > Not a functional change.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Denis Mukhin <[email protected]>
> 
> Hmm, the upsides and downsides aren't being discussed at all. You're ...
> 
> > --- a/xen/drivers/char/console.c
> > +++ b/xen/drivers/char/console.c
> > @@ -1303,15 +1303,15 @@ bool __printk_ratelimit(unsigned int ratelimit_ms,
> >          spin_unlock(&ratelimit_lock);
> >          if ( lost )
> >          {
> > -            char lost_str[10];
> > +            char msg[64];
> > +
> > +            snprintf(msg, sizeof(msg),
> > +                     "printk: %u messages suppressed\n", lost);
> >  
> > -            snprintf(lost_str, sizeof(lost_str), "%u", lost);
> >              /* console_lock may already be acquired by printk(). */
> >              rspin_lock(&console_lock);
> >              printk_start_of_line(CONSOLE_PREFIX);
> > -            __putstr("printk: ");
> > -            __putstr(lost_str);
> > -            __putstr(" messages suppressed.\n");
> > +            __putstr(msg);
> >              rspin_unlock(&console_lock);
> >          }
> >          local_irq_restore(flags);
> 
> ... trading slightly smaller code size + slightly better performance for
> slightly bigger stack utilization. It's not entirely obvious that this is
> a good deal.

Thanks for the feedback!
I will drop that patch from the series.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.