Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] xen/sched: rename scheduler registration symbols
Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.xenproject.lists.xen-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 04.08.2026 07:53, Furkan Caliskan wrote: > REGISTER_SCHEDULER(), schedulers[], NUM_SCHEDULERS, and the > per-arch SCHEDULER_ARRAY linker macro now register and hold > struct sched_ops instances rather than struct scheduler ones, > but still carry names describing the old type. > > Rename them to match the current behaviour. > No functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Furkan Caliskan <[email protected]> > --- > xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S | 2 +- > xen/arch/ppc/xen.lds.S | 2 +- > xen/arch/riscv/xen.lds.S | 2 +- > xen/arch/x86/xen.lds.S | 2 +- > xen/common/sched/arinc653.c | 2 +- > xen/common/sched/core.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++---------------- > xen/common/sched/credit.c | 2 +- > xen/common/sched/credit2.c | 2 +- > xen/common/sched/null.c | 2 +- > xen/common/sched/private.h | 4 ++-- > xen/common/sched/rt.c | 2 +- > xen/include/xen/xen.lds.h | 10 +++++----- > 12 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) I'm not quite sure if all of this is really useful. In many (all?) places I think "scheduler" as a term is still quite applicable. One (general) nit though: if already you touch malformed lines (overlong ones is which prompted this comment), please adjust them to be style- conformant. Jan