Re: [PATCH 17/24] XSM: make Argo hooks well-formed ones

Jason Andryuk <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.xenproject.lists.xen-devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2026-08-06 03:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 06.08.2026 01:02, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
>> On 7/28/26 9:22 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> @@ -2307,7 +2308,7 @@ argo_init(struct domain *d)
>>>    {
>>>        struct argo_domain *argo;
>>>    
>>> -    if ( !opt_argo || xsm_argo_enable(d) )
>>> +    if ( !opt_argo || xsm_argo_enable(XSM_HOOK, d) )
>>
>> This question came up on another thread, so thought I might point it out
>> that when FLASK is in use this can return a nubmer of error codes beyond
>> an access deny. While I know it's the existing behavior, but if the
>> error code is anything other than -EPERM, then it's not that the policy
>> denied the access but something cause a fault in the security server. In
>> that case the domain is still being allowed to construct with the
>> assumption that it was a policy deny. At a minimum should the error code
>> at least get reported, and perhaps it should be passed up to domain
>> construction to allowing it to make an informed decision on construction?
>
> Sounds plausible, but definitely wants doing in a separate patch.

I think this is a mis-use of xsm_argo_enable().  As I wrote in [1], this 
isn't an access decision, but an ~optimization to skip initializing argo 
data structures when a domain is not allowed to use argo.

With Flask, this prints an AVC denial during domain construction when 
the domain doesn't have argo enabled.  That is misleading as it isn't 
the domain's action causing the access.  In OpenXT, I wrote a patch to 
add a noaudit variant to hide the denial.  I didn't upstream it because 
I didn't really like it.

The issue is really the conditional initialization of d->argo.  It seems 
like it would be simpler to always initialized argo for all domains. 
xsm_argo_enable() would still prevent using it, but internal checking of 
d->argo could be removed.

Regards,
Jason

[1] 
https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/[email protected]/T/#m149e1571b819a0cf481eea558c6220a5a24d5285
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.