Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] Various patches to improve Secure Boot support

On Wed, 19 Aug 2026 at 11:12, Jan Beulich <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 19.08.2026 12:03, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > On Sat, 8 Aug 2026 at 07:41, Frediano Ziglio <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 15 Jul 2026 at 07:22, Frediano Ziglio <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> These patches improve support for Secure boot.
> >>> UEFI CA memory mitigation requires memory pages to be not executable and
> >>> writable at the same time. So changing permissions and splitting some section
> >>> is required.
> >>> Remove multiboot pieces from EFI executable.
> >>>
> >>> Changes since v1:
> >>> - improved some comments;
> >>> - merged 2 pacthes removing multiboot support in x86 PE;
> >>> - removed a patch dealing with SBAT;
> >>> - other minor changes (see single patches).
> >>>
> >>> Changes since v2:
> >>> - improved some comments.
> >>>
> >>> Changes since v3:
> >>> - Added Acked-by;
> >>> - Improve commit message.
> >>>
> >>> Changes since v4:
> >>> - Messages updates;
> >>> - Clean some dependencies cause by code removal;
> >>> - Add small commit to remove a possibly unused string.
> >>>
> >>> Changes since v5:
> >>> - removed merged commit;
> >>> - remove more code/data from xen.efi output.
> >>>
> >>> Changes since v6:
> >>> - fix commit message.
> >>>
> >>> Changes since v7:
> >>> - added Acked-by, all commit are now acked.
> >>>
> >>> Frediano Ziglio (2):
> >>>   Align relevant sections to 4KB
> >>>   x86: Split .init section to satisfy UEFI CA memory mitigation
> >>>
> >>> Roger Pau Monné (2):
> >>>   x86/efi: discard multiboot and PVH support for PE binary
> >>>   x86/efi: avoid a relocation in efi_arch_post_exit_boot()
> >>>
> >>>  docs/hypervisor-guide/x86/how-xen-boots.rst |  6 -----
> >>>  xen/arch/x86/boot/head.S                    |  8 +++----
> >>>  xen/arch/x86/efi/efi-boot.h                 |  7 ++++--
> >>>  xen/arch/x86/xen.lds.S                      | 25 ++++++++++++---------
> >>>  xen/tools/combine_two_binaries.py           |  2 +-
> >>>  5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> Ping
> >
> > Ping
>
> Andrew had indicated to me (apparently not to you?) that he'd like to
> massage the descriptions some while committing. Hence why I refrained
> from putting any of this in.
>
> Jan

I understand maybe we want better comments and explaining what's
missing/improvable could take more time than updating them directly,
but how many months does this require?
Especially after the changes had different acks.

Frediano