Re: [PATCH 0/7] x86: Address Space Isolation, part 1: per-domain area mapping rework
George Dunlap <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.xenproject.lists.xen-devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFLBxZYZLMzMwt8uOgVGgjYvZDGgX4sH5ukqf0Vuo6Rxao2JPg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 4:17 PM George Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote: > Ultimately, I think there's a lot of wisdom in the saying, "Premature > optimization is the root of all evil." As I said, it's certainly > right to be on our guard against adding things to xenheap, and look at > alternatives; but we're nowhere near the point where we need to say, > "Absolutely nothing added, regardless of the cost." The design here > is not locking us into the pages long-term; alternate designs have a > significant cost in terms of authoring, reviewing, code complexity and > maintenance, and code performance. To get a sense of how much this approach simplifies things, look at how patch 1 of this series simplified create_perdomain_mapping; and look at how much simpler patch 2 is compared to Roger's implementation [1]. The xenheap option is way easier to review and maintain. -George [1] https://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=173634640624259