Re: [meta-arago][scarthgap][PATCH] nnshark: Set missing PV
Ryan Eatmon <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | org.yoctoproject.lists.meta-arago |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/20/2025 10:09 AM, Andrew Davis wrote: > On 11/19/25 3:52 PM, Ryan Eatmon via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: >> Based on the git repo, the latest tag was v0.6.1 and then some >> additional commits in git. So tag the current PV to 0.6.1+git. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ryan Eatmon <[email protected]> >> --- >> meta-arago-extras/recipes-multimedia/nnshark/nnshark_git.bb | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git >> a/meta-arago-extras/recipes-multimedia/nnshark/nnshark_git.bb >> b/meta-arago-extras/recipes-multimedia/nnshark/nnshark_git.bb >> index 505aaa4c..89be15f5 100644 >> --- a/meta-arago-extras/recipes-multimedia/nnshark/nnshark_git.bb >> +++ b/meta-arago-extras/recipes-multimedia/nnshark/nnshark_git.bb >> @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ LICENSE = "GPL-2.0-only & LGPL-2.1-only" >> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = >> "file://COPYING;md5=e1caa368743492879002ad032445fa97 \ >> >> file://COPYING.LESSER;md5=66c40c88533cd228b5b85936709801c8" >> +PV = "0.6.1+git" >> + > > That tag was 6 years ago, same issue for Coremark in that other thread, > seems some projects just gave up on doing tagged releases. I wonder at > what point the "version" stops making sense and we should fallback to > only the git sha? Oh well, problem for another time, Generally I would agree, but if the tag was six years ago and the last commit was three years ago... So all in all it feels like a dead project. > Reviewed-by: Andrew Davis <[email protected]> > >> SRC_URI = >> "git://github.com/nnstreamer/nnshark.git;protocol=https;branch=master;name=nnshark \ >> >> git://github.com/GStreamer/common.git;protocol=https;branch=master;name=common;subdir=${S}/common \ >> " > -- Ryan Eatmon [email protected] ----------------------------------------- Texas Instruments, Inc. - LCPD - MGTS