Re: [meta-freescale] [meta-qoriq][RESEND PATCH 1/2] lxc: Move to dynamic-layers

On 7/9/22 6:47 AM, Andrey Zhizhikin wrote:
> [You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
> 
> Hello Sean,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 10:42 PM Sean Anderson via
> lists.yoctoproject.org <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/17/22 11:36 AM, Sean Anderson wrote:
>> > This bbappend depends on the virtualization-layer collection. Move it
>> > under the appropriate dynamic layer directory.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <[email protected]>
>> > ---
>> >
>> >  .../virtualization-layer/recipes-containers}/lxc/lxc_%.bbappend   | 0
>> >  1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> >  rename {recipes-containers => dynamic-layers/virtualization-layer/recipes-containers}/lxc/lxc_%.bbappend (100%)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/recipes-containers/lxc/lxc_%.bbappend b/dynamic-layers/virtualization-layer/recipes-containers/lxc/lxc_%.bbappend
>> > similarity index 100%
>> > rename from recipes-containers/lxc/lxc_%.bbappend
>> > rename to dynamic-layers/virtualization-layer/recipes-containers/lxc/lxc_%.bbappend
>> >
>>
>> ping?
> 
> If this targets `meta-freescale` layer,

This targets meta-qoriq.

> then perhaps best would be to
> send a PR against it. I'm not sure that someone is picking up patches
> from this ML...

Unfortunately, there is no dedicated mailing list for meta-qoriq. I have
CC'd as many relevant people at NXP as I can find. I have added this
mailing list to CC in hopes that if I have omitted the proper person at
NXP that they can apply it.

--Sean