Re: [meta-freescale] Anyone currently working with ADLINK's LEC-iMX6 SMARC module?

"Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]> Tue, 2 Sep 2025 09:16:30 -0400 (EDT)
Newsgroups org.yoctoproject.lists.meta-freescale
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 2 Sep 2025, Robert P. J. Day wrote:

>
>   Hoping this is the right place to ask, I was just handed a board
> incorporating ADLINK's LEC-iMX6 SMARC module:
>
> https://www.adlinktech.com/Products/Computer_on_Modules/SMARC/LEC-iMX6?lang=en
>
> whose last YP build (I have the tarball) was five years ago based on
> the YP Zeus branch. I want to bring stuff up to date so that at least
> the basic YP build uses Scarthgap, but I can see that that particular
> SMARC module is supported in ADLINK's repo back in its Zeus branch
> here:
>
> https://github.com/ADLINK/meta-adlink-nxp/blob/zeus/conf/machine/lec-imx6-1.conf
>
> So my plan is to fetch Scarthgap for the basic build, then assume I'll
> need the Zeus branch of ADLINK's repo for the machine conf file for
> that module.
>
>   Is anyone else working with that particular target and can tell me
> if this is the right approach?

  I should have mentioned that, while I dig into supporting that
particular module, I can at least do a trial run with a
freescale-supplied machine definition that resembles it, so I can
start things off with
"meta-freescale/conf/machine/imx6qdlsabresd.conf" without having to
add any more layers.

  Does that sound reasonable?

rday