Re: [meta-freescale] Anyone currently working with ADLINK's LEC-iMX6 SMARC module?
"Robert P. J. Day" <[email protected]> Tue, 2 Sep 2025 09:16:30 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | org.yoctoproject.lists.meta-freescale |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2 Sep 2025, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > Hoping this is the right place to ask, I was just handed a board > incorporating ADLINK's LEC-iMX6 SMARC module: > > https://www.adlinktech.com/Products/Computer_on_Modules/SMARC/LEC-iMX6?lang=en > > whose last YP build (I have the tarball) was five years ago based on > the YP Zeus branch. I want to bring stuff up to date so that at least > the basic YP build uses Scarthgap, but I can see that that particular > SMARC module is supported in ADLINK's repo back in its Zeus branch > here: > > https://github.com/ADLINK/meta-adlink-nxp/blob/zeus/conf/machine/lec-imx6-1.conf > > So my plan is to fetch Scarthgap for the basic build, then assume I'll > need the Zeus branch of ADLINK's repo for the machine conf file for > that module. > > Is anyone else working with that particular target and can tell me > if this is the right approach? I should have mentioned that, while I dig into supporting that particular module, I can at least do a trial run with a freescale-supplied machine definition that resembles it, so I can start things off with "meta-freescale/conf/machine/imx6qdlsabresd.conf" without having to add any more layers. Does that sound reasonable? rday