Re: [meta-ti][master][PATCH] RFC: meta-beagle: Fix TF-A machine name for badge

On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 12:54:02PM -0500, Mendez, Judith via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> BeagleBadge board has been renamed to am62l3-badge
> in the new TFA ti-tfa-2.14.y branch [0], so update
> recipe TFA_BOARD accordingly.
> 
> [0] https://github.com/TexasInstruments/arm-trusted-firmware/commit/d203b8453905178252094416448de009931087e0
> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <[email protected]>
> ---
> Due to build errors with arago-master-config, this patch
> has not been built tested, thus sending as RFC.
> ---
>  meta-beagle/conf/machine/beaglebadge-ti.conf | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/meta-beagle/conf/machine/beaglebadge-ti.conf b/meta-beagle/conf/machine/beaglebadge-ti.conf
> index d62730ed..78525030 100644
> --- a/meta-beagle/conf/machine/beaglebadge-ti.conf
> +++ b/meta-beagle/conf/machine/beaglebadge-ti.conf
> @@ -18,4 +18,4 @@ KERNEL_DEVICETREE = ""
>  
>  UBOOT_MACHINE = "am62lx_badge_defconfig"
>  
> -TFA_BOARD = "am62l-badge"
> +TFA_BOARD = "am62l3-badge"

This looks reasonable, on the surface at least.

Andrew, Praneeth,

How stable is the API around TFA?

Do we want to keep multiple versions of TFA and select the corresponding one 
based on which BSP is in use (6.6, 6.12, 6.18)?

I realize it's not specific to the kernel version, but to other low-level boot 
pieces, which all get updated at the same time, even though U-boot and kernel 
may be old...

-- 
Denys