Re: [meta-ti] [PATCH] mesa-pvr: correct INSANE_SKIP for mesa-megadriver

On Mon, Jul 20 2026, Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 20, 2026 at 09:14:42AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 17 2026, Ryan Eatmon <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> > On 7/17/2026 7:48 AM, Rasmus Villemoes via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
>> >> In the original file this was copied from, $PN == mesa. But in this
>> >> context, $PN == mesa-pvr, while the PACKAGES and FILES logic still
>> >> explicitly refers to the mesa-megadriver package. Hence the build
>> >> fails
>> >> 
>> >
>> > Good catch.  I wonder why we are not seeing these QA errors in our
>> > builds.  Are you turning something special on?
>> 
>> No, not that I know of. I hit this immediately when trying to update
>> from whinlatter to wrynose, but I don't think we have any special flags
>> set anywhere that should increase bitbake warning/pedantic level or
>> something like that.
>
> It's not about warning or pedantic level. It's rather about how you have 
> mesa and the entire distro configured. Because we don't have any of those 
> 4 libraries in /usr/lib/dri/ being built, as we only build for Wayland, but 
> not X11.
>
> PACKAGECONFIG="gallium video-codecs vulkan wayland opengl egl gles gbm virgl opencl libclc gallium-llvm zink xmlconfig gallium-llvm"
> DISTRO_FEATURES="pam opencl systemd usrmerge 3g acl alsa bluetooth debuginfod ext2 gobject-introspection-data ipv4 ipv6 ldconfig multiarch nfc nfs opengl pci pulseaudio seccomp vfat vulkan wayland wifi xattr zeroconf"
> DISTRO_FEATURES_OPTED_OUT="ptest x11"
>
> Might want to compare these to your settings.
>
> Anyway, your fix is correct - this is just an explanation for why we are not 
> seeing the error in our builds.

Thanks.

Any chance this could be applied/backported to wrynose?

Rasmus