Re: [meta-virtualization] [PATCH 0/3] Update docker-moby to v25.0.9

Bruce Ashfield <[email protected]>
Newsgroups org.yoctoproject.lists.meta-virtualization
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I merged a set of CVE fixes to docker, and this no
longer applies.

It isn't that I can't fix the reject, it is that
it should be double checked to ensure that those
CVE fixes aren't duplicated in this minor bump or
cause other issues.

Can you send a new version once that check is done ?

Bruce

In message: [meta-virtualization] [PATCH 0/3] Update docker-moby to v25.0.9
on 16/02/2026 felix via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:

> This patch updates docker-moby to version v25.0.9.
> 
> This is not the latest release of the v25.0 branch but the latest
> supporting Go 1.22, provided in oe-core scarthgap.
> Updating to newer releases will require updating go to 1.23.
> 
> Signed-off-by: F�lix Pi�dallu <[email protected]>
> ---
> F�lix Pi�dallu (3):
>       docker-moby: Update libnetwork
>       docker-moby: Update docker cli
>       docker-moby: Update to v25.0.9
> 
>  recipes-containers/docker/docker-moby_git.bb       |  11 +-
>  .../docker/files/CVE-2024-29018.patch              | 344 ---------------------
>  .../docker/files/CVE-2024-36620.patch              |  39 ---
>  .../docker/files/CVE-2024-36621.patch              |  82 -----
>  4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 472 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 8b1543e121deda2445f80f74d85c10316d5b31f4
> change-id: 20260216-upstream-update-docker-moby-d0826db5916b
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> F�lix Pi�dallu <[email protected]>
> 

> 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#9591): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-virtualization/message/9591
> Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/117842532/1050810
> Group Owner: [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-virtualization/unsub [[email protected]]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.