Re: [poky] dnf5 and libdnf5 target release?
Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> Wed, 13 Aug 2025 13:01:33 +0200
| Newsgroups | org.yoctoproject.lists.poky |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANNYZj9X74cOCZsOp1w33ELrcFMMrC46TCd68dJTfjUtJcTYbw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 at 12:25, Niko Mauno <[email protected]> wrote: > On related note, about 5 weeks ago we briefly tried out if using dnf5 would yield any improvement in do_rootfs() turnaround time -- which it didn't (later on realized others seemed to also have expressed their surprise on lack of dnf5 performance improvement over dnf4 in some online discussion threads). I'm not surprised. The bulk of do_rootfs is creating a repository index (not done by dnf), resolving dependencies (not done by dnf), and unpacking and writing out .rpm content (also not done by dnf). Dnf5 might feel snappier in interactive command line sessions, but otherwise the whole project seems somewhat misguided. Alex