Re: [poky] [PATCH v2 2/2] oeqa runtime parselogs: ignore KV260 USB error on genericarm64
Richard Purdie <[email protected]> Fri, 06 Mar 2026 12:17:32 +0000
| Newsgroups | org.yoctoproject.lists.poky |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <f0efec2c7ec34b40379153e3d871d76044bd4243.camel@linuxfoundation.org> |
On Fri, 2026-03-06 at 11:33 +0200, Mikko Rapeli via lists.yoctoproject.org = wrote: > On AMD KV260 the USB 1-1 driver sometimes throws this new warning at boot= but > continues and USB stack works so ignore the error: >=20 > usb 1-1: device descriptor read/64, error -71 > hub 1-1:1.0: USB hub found > hub 1-1:1.0: 5 ports detected > usb 2-1: new SuperSpeed USB device number 2 using xhci-hcd > hub 2-1:1.0: USB hub found > hub 2-1:1.0: 4 ports detected >=20 > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/automated-testing/message/1525 >=20 > Signed-off-by: Mikko Rapeli <[email protected]> I'm sure people will tell me I should just merge these and we move on. Before I do that, I want to be really clear that this approach really isn't great. It amounts to "oh, we have errors we don't even understand but we'll just ignore them and hope for the best". Should we even bother with the test if we're just going to ignore anything it shows up? I appreciate Mikko can't go and fight the world on issues like this and this isn't directed at him, it is just a general frustration with the "quality" of where software seems to be going. Where do we draw the line if we're just going to ignore any error? Cheers, Richard